Review: All the Money in the World

Kevin who? Christopher Plummer and co. excel in this stylish and gripping thriller.

By Max Weiss | December 29, 2017, 3:06 pm


Review: All the Money in the World

Kevin who? Christopher Plummer and co. excel in this stylish and gripping thriller.

By Max Weiss | December 29, 2017, 3:06 pm

Get Baltimore Daily.

Sign up today and you'll get our latest stories delivered straight to your inbox every weekday afternoon.


Christopher Plummer was allegedly director Ridley Scott’s first choice to play billionaire J. Paul Getty and I can see why. He has the bearing, the voice, the gravitas. He’s not just great as Getty—although he is—he seems inevitable. We’ll never know what Kevin Spacey—who was replaced at the eleventh hour after sexual abuse allegations against him emerged—would have done with the part. Odds are, he would’ve done that Spacey thing, which is to say, he’d ham it up enjoyably, italicize every bit of irony, and never let you forget that you were watching a capital P performance (the bad makeup, on display in an early version of the trailer, wouldn’t have helped). I’m sure he would’ve been fun, in his own way—but he certainly wouldn’t have felt inevitable.

I’ve got to hand it to Scott and crew. When I first found out that they were replacing Spacey with Plummer with only six weeks (!) to go before the film’s release date, I thought it was impossible (I even tweeted out a GIF of Wally Shawn’s “inconceivable!” from The Princess Bride). How wrong I was. Sure, you might spend the first few minutes of the film trying to suss out how they did it—which scenes are reshoots? which are just canny bits of CGI?—but after that, you’ll be too involved in the action to care. 

All the Money in the World isn’t a great film but it’s a very enjoyable one, mounted with suspense and smarts and an abundance of style by that pro’s pro Ridley Scott. Both he and Plummer have a way of making this all look easy.

The story is a famous one—although if you don’t know much about the kidnapping of John “Paul” Getty III (Charlie Plummer), I’d avoid the Wikipedia page. There were a few moments of great tension that didn’t quite land for me, because I knew the real story too well.

Here’s what happened: In 1973, Paul, who was J. Paul Getty’s favorite grandchild and, at the time, a louche teenager with long hair and a bell-bottomed lounge suit, is kidnapped in Rome. His ransom is set at $17 million dollars. Everyone assumes that Paul’s mother, Gail (Michelle Williams) can afford to pay, even though she’s long divorced from Paul’s wastrel father (Andrew Buchan). But it turns out that J. Paul Getty is not just the richest, but the stingiest man alive (the two are clearly not unrelated). Gail has received no endowment and is essentially broke. She begs Getty for the money. He refuses, noting that he has 14 grandchildren—and that if he paid the ransom this time, they’d all get kidnapped.

Getty’s logic seems unassailable, in a way, except we see that this is his way of life—covetously collecting art and real estate and steadfastly refusing to give anything away to charity, often with the same excuse: If I gave to one, I’d have to give to all. He does, however, loan out his beefy director of security, Fletcher Chase (Mark Wahlberg), to help track down the kidnappers.

The film toggles back and forth between young Paul and his terrifying ordeal, scenes of Getty being a cheap (if brilliant) bastard, and the relentless Gail, as she works with Chase and the Roman police.

As the preternaturally self-possessed Gail, Williams gives a brilliant performance. It’s true, her Jackie O-like accent is a little extra, as the kids say. But she is a remarkably expressive and nuanced actress. Gail was chastised by the public and press at the time for not crying enough, but Williams shows the desperation beneath Gail’s steely resolve. It’s a shame, though, that she has to act opposite the stiff Wahlberg, who doesn’t do particularly distinguished work here. (Kristy Puchko of Pajiba jokingly remarked that he seems like the one who was edited in at the last minute.)

All in all, I was seduced by this film. It’s a gripping suspense thriller and a fabulous portrait of the bottomless nature of greed. I've got to tip my hat to those wily gents Ridley Scott and Christopher Plummer. Damned if they didn’t pull it off.



Meet The Author
Max Weiss is the managing editor of Baltimore and a film and pop culture critic.

You May Also Like

The Chatter

Davon Fleming Eliminated From The Voice and Fans Are Not Happy

Disappointed fans of Fleming took to social media to vent.

Arts District

The Big Baltimore Playlist: December 2017

The top five local songs you should download right now.

The Chatter

Joseph Kohl Photography Exhibit is Spontaneous and Beautiful

Maryland Historical Society celebrates one of Baltimore’s most distinctive photojournalists and artists.

On The Town

Ring in 2018 With These New Year’s Eve Parties and Concerts

From family fun to midnight music, here’s your New Year’s Eve going-out guide.

Arts District

Co_Lab Books Opens This Month in Old Goucher

When architects design a bookstore, aesthetics are the focus

Arts District

Blind Balloon Artist HongSeok Goh Shows Off Massive Work at AVAM

South Korea artist creates one-of-a-kind installation at the American Visionary Art Museum.

Connect With Us

Most Read

Here’s What We’d Like to See in the New Penn Station: Penn Station Partners will be refreshing the century-old train station.

Baltimore Women’s March Moves Downtown as Thousands Plan to Participate: This year’s theme encourages voter registration in 2018 elections.

The Rowhouse Grille Hosts LLS Fundraiser Honoring Alex Wroblewski: The 41-year-old Locust Point resident was fatally shot outside of Royal Farms in November.

Ryan’s Daughter Owner Shares Fond Memories Before Closing This Weekend: Marwan Daas and his wife pay tribute to their 14-year-old Irish pub.

Ten Incredibly Easy Ways to Be More Active in 2018: Get creative with walking meetings, workout buddies, and local sports leagues.