Review: All the Money in the World

Kevin who? Christopher Plummer and co. excel in this stylish and gripping thriller.

By Max Weiss | December 29, 2017, 3:06 pm


Review: All the Money in the World

Kevin who? Christopher Plummer and co. excel in this stylish and gripping thriller.

By Max Weiss | December 29, 2017, 3:06 pm

Get Baltimore Daily.

Sign up today and you'll get our latest stories delivered straight to your inbox every weekday afternoon.


Christopher Plummer was allegedly director Ridley Scott’s first choice to play billionaire J. Paul Getty and I can see why. He has the bearing, the voice, the gravitas. He’s not just great as Getty—although he is—he seems inevitable. We’ll never know what Kevin Spacey—who was replaced at the eleventh hour after sexual abuse allegations against him emerged—would have done with the part. Odds are, he would’ve done that Spacey thing, which is to say, he’d ham it up enjoyably, italicize every bit of irony, and never let you forget that you were watching a capital P performance (the bad makeup, on display in an early version of the trailer, wouldn’t have helped). I’m sure he would’ve been fun, in his own way—but he certainly wouldn’t have felt inevitable.

I’ve got to hand it to Scott and crew. When I first found out that they were replacing Spacey with Plummer with only six weeks (!) to go before the film’s release date, I thought it was impossible (I even tweeted out a GIF of Wally Shawn’s “inconceivable!” from The Princess Bride). How wrong I was. Sure, you might spend the first few minutes of the film trying to suss out how they did it—which scenes are reshoots? which are just canny bits of CGI?—but after that, you’ll be too involved in the action to care. 

All the Money in the World isn’t a great film but it’s a very enjoyable one, mounted with suspense and smarts and an abundance of style by that pro’s pro Ridley Scott. Both he and Plummer have a way of making this all look easy.

The story is a famous one—although if you don’t know much about the kidnapping of John “Paul” Getty III (Charlie Plummer), I’d avoid the Wikipedia page. There were a few moments of great tension that didn’t quite land for me, because I knew the real story too well.

Here’s what happened: In 1973, Paul, who was J. Paul Getty’s favorite grandchild and, at the time, a louche teenager with long hair and a bell-bottomed lounge suit, is kidnapped in Rome. His ransom is set at $17 million dollars. Everyone assumes that Paul’s mother, Gail (Michelle Williams) can afford to pay, even though she’s long divorced from Paul’s wastrel father (Andrew Buchan). But it turns out that J. Paul Getty is not just the richest, but the stingiest man alive (the two are clearly not unrelated). Gail has received no endowment and is essentially broke. She begs Getty for the money. He refuses, noting that he has 14 grandchildren—and that if he paid the ransom this time, they’d all get kidnapped.

Getty’s logic seems unassailable, in a way, except we see that this is his way of life—covetously collecting art and real estate and steadfastly refusing to give anything away to charity, often with the same excuse: If I gave to one, I’d have to give to all. He does, however, loan out his beefy director of security, Fletcher Chase (Mark Wahlberg), to help track down the kidnappers.

The film toggles back and forth between young Paul and his terrifying ordeal, scenes of Getty being a cheap (if brilliant) bastard, and the relentless Gail, as she works with Chase and the Roman police.

As the preternaturally self-possessed Gail, Williams gives a brilliant performance. It’s true, her Jackie O-like accent is a little extra, as the kids say. But she is a remarkably expressive and nuanced actress. Gail was chastised by the public and press at the time for not crying enough, but Williams shows the desperation beneath Gail’s steely resolve. It’s a shame, though, that she has to act opposite the stiff Wahlberg, who doesn’t do particularly distinguished work here. (Kristy Puchko of Pajiba jokingly remarked that he seems like the one who was edited in at the last minute.)

All in all, I was seduced by this film. It’s a gripping suspense thriller and a fabulous portrait of the bottomless nature of greed. I've got to tip my hat to those wily gents Ridley Scott and Christopher Plummer. Damned if they didn’t pull it off.



Meet The Author

Max Weiss is the editor-in-chief of Baltimore and a film and pop culture critic.

You May Also Like

Arts District

Lauren Ruth Ward Returns Home a Rock Star

The up-and-coming, Baltimore-born singer performs at the Ottobar this Saturday.

Arts District

WTMD Announces 2018 First Thursday Concerts

Starting on May 3, this annual festival includes a lineup of local and national talent.


The Good, The Meh, and The Oh-So Awkward Moments of The 2018 Oscars

From dresses to speeches to the after party, the Academy Awards mostly played it safe.

On The Town

Ten Things to Look Out for at the New Hotel Revival in Mt. Vernon

The new 14-story property features private karaoke rooms and panoramic views.

Arts District

The Big Baltimore Playlist: March 2018

The top five local songs you should download right now.

Arts & Culture

The New Normal's

Waverly’s eclectic book and record store gets a new look.

Connect With Us

Most Read

The Big Baltimore Playlist: April 2018: The top five local songs you should download right now.

Open & Shut: Sacré Sucré Coming Soon; The Emporiyum Takes a Break; In Bloom Closes: The latest restaurant openings, closings, and recent news.

Halfway Through Light City, Crowds Continue to Flock Downtown : Tuesday night featured performances from an area step team and Fluid Movement.

Maryland-Based Company Captures Milestones with 3D Photography: GoFigure 3D Photography creates lifelike figurines.

Enoch Pratt’s Mobile Job Center Wins National Award in Its First Year: The Power of Libraries Award was presented to Enoch Pratt Library for its work in the community.