The Baltimore Museum of Art started 2019 with one of the busiest weekends in its history—including a rare “sold out” day—as hundreds lined up to see the John Waters retrospective before it closed.

On Saturday, museum staffers were forced to deny admission to prospective patrons by mid-afternoon, after ticket sales reached capacity for the building’s galleries. The museum stayed open past its regular Saturday operating hours to accommodate the long lines of people who had reservations. Sunday was almost as busy.

The show that drew the crowds was John Waters: Indecent Exposure, an exhibit of visual art created by the Baltimore-based writer, filmmaker and visual artist.

On view since October 7, this was the first retrospective in Baltimore of Waters’ work as a visual artist, and Sunday was the last day of the show. The museum is open for free but charges an admission for certain exhibits, including the Waters retrospective. Ticket prices ranged from $5 for visitors 18 and under to $15 for adults. Not even members could gain admission if they didn’t have a reservation.

On Saturday, demand for tickets was so strong that sales were cut off around 3:30 p.m. Visitors who came to the museum after that were greeted with a sign at the reservations desk stating that the exhibit was sold out and encouraging people to make reservations for Sunday.

“Yesterday was the single busiest day that we had for this exhibit,” even surpassing opening day, said Mercedes Lopez, the museum’s visitor experience manager. In all, 1,294 people saw the show on Saturday, and 1,168 saw it on Sunday, according to the museum’s count. They came from all over Maryland, and an unusually high percentage weren’t museum members, Lopez added.

“People are definitely coming out to see John Waters,” she said. “We had a lot of people who had never been to the museum before, but who had run into John in a bar or saw his Christmas show. It’s always exciting to have first-time visitors.”

Lopez said the last BMA exhibit to have a sold-out day was the Matisse/Dieberkorn show in 2016, featuring the works of Henri Matisse and Richard Diebenkorn. For the John Waters show, the mood was more relaxed and playful, she said.

“We had a lot of unusual outfits, a lot of people dressing up. People came in beehives and as characters from his movies. That was a lot of fun to see the quirkiness of his fans.”

On Sunday, Lopez said, the museum was at capacity from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. but still had some tickets in the afternoon, when the Ravens were playing the Chargers at M&T Bank Stadium.

People standing in line around 4:30 p.m. Saturday had various reasons for waiting to visit the museum. Some said they received the tickets as gifts and that the day and time were chosen in advance. Others said they knew the show was ending and bought the tickets just before sales were cut off.

Liz Fisher said she came from Easton to see the show. “My daughter gave this to me for Christmas,” she said, adding that she is a big fan of Waters. “Better late than never.”

“We’re last-minute Larrys,” admitted Kate Clemmons, who stood at the end of the line with her husband, Brent. She also said they got the tickets as a gift and that they were celebrating an important occasion: “It’s our wedding anniversary.”

Jason Bartholomew said he and his wife Rebecca Klein were near the end of the line because “we have a 5 year old.” Bartholomew said they put off getting tickets because they figured the show “would be there forever,” then realized it was closing on January 6. He said they called for tickets around 3 p.m. on Saturday and apparently got them just before sales ended.

Francis Tucci wasn’t so lucky. She and a friend drove from Howard County to see the show and were told tickets were sold out. She said they stayed to see other exhibits at the museum, including the Cone collection and the Ebony G. Patterson tapestry exhibit in the Berman Textile Gallery.

Tucci speculated that the partial shutdown of the federal government may have contributed to the crowds, because many of the museums in Washington were closed on Saturday. “I’m thinking that because of the shutdown in D. C., a lot of people came here,” she said.

The crowds were good for business at the museum’s gift shop and restaurant Gertrude’s Chesapeake Kitchen, both of which were busy through the weekend. Many in the gift shop were buying Waters-related souvenirs, including framed prints, T-shirts, and tank tops.

Besides triggering a sell-out, the John Waters show was shaping up to be BMA exhibit with the highest attendance in 2018, according to the museum’s senior director of communications, Anne Mannix-Brown, who said the Waters show was likely to be the “highest attended” for the year, although not the highest in museum history.

Those who missed Indecent Exposure during its Baltimore run still have a chance to see it if they are willing to travel. The exhibit opens at the Wexner Center for the Arts in Columbus, Ohio, on February 2 and runs through April 28.

No one better represents Baltimore’s fringe arts scene than living icon John Waters. From putting his hometown and its off-beat characters on the big screen in Hairspray to sparking the city’s affection for kitschy plastic flamingos and drag queen Divine in Pink Flamingos, his five-decade arts career continues to this day—and his eccentricity does, too.

On October 7, the Baltimore Museum of Art will unveil John Waters: Indecent Exposure, a retrospective of his work dating back to the 1990s, featuring more than 160 photos, video clips, early films, photocopied drawings, sculptures, and assorted ephemera (like archival photos of John with Andy Warhol and the framed Joan Miró reproduction he bought at the BMA Shop when he was a child). We asked him to reflect on some of his favorites from the upcoming salon-style exhibit.

You’ve lived in Baltimore all your life, you’ve been exhibiting in the U.S. and abroad for some 20 years—why are you just now doing this massive exhibit in your hometown?
I think it’s the right time for me to come home and have a show at the Baltimore Museum [of Art]. I couldn’t have the first one there because people would’ve just said, “Oh, that’s just because he lives in Baltimore.” I had to go out in the rest of the world and build 20 years of exhibitions and museum shows and books. Now that I’ve done that, I think Baltimore is the perfect homecoming. It’s where I got my first taste for the love of how art can infuriate people.

Baltimore is so prominent in all your films. It’s not obvious to a viewer whether it’s prominent in your visual art as well. Is it?
No. It’s the only thing I do that has very little to do with Baltimore. Not completely. My studio is there. My art assistants are there. I have a piece about Mr. Ray, who was one of the most notorious hairdo lunatics on the radio in Baltimore for decades, that I idolized—and he was horrified that I liked him [laughs].

What is it about Baltimore that’s kept you here?
Everything—the sense of humor and the extreme style. Everything I wrote about, everything that informed me was always about taking what some people think is a negative thing and exaggerating it, turning it into a style, and having a sense of humor about it. Baltimoreans have always done that. I like living there now more than I ever did because it’s the only place left that has a bohemia. It’s gotten more expensive, but it’s still cheaper than anywhere else. And kids can still live there and start, you know, bohemia! And the music scene there, the people who have had national success—they stayed. They bought houses. I think that’s very, very important, to stay in Baltimore.

You see that happening with the younger generations of artists?
Yes, I do. I see musicians and artists that grew up in Baltimore didn’t leave when they got success, and students that came here decided to stay. That’s all kind of new and good. You don’t have to leave Baltimore anymore to have success. You might have to have people outside of Baltimore like [your work], but you don’t have to leave.

So getting back to your exhibit—I understand that you take photos of TV screens and rearrange them to create a new narrative.
Yes, most of the work is like that. This show is really about editing. I take images from other people’s movies and put them in a completely different context, often with other movies and scenes, and tell a story that you read from left to write. So it’s about writing and editing.

All your career has been about that, right?
Yeah, you know, I write all my movies, I write all my books. I’ve never made a movie I didn’t write. This is just telling a story in a different way—in the art world rather than in a movie or onstage when I speak. It’s about telling a story and celebrating the failure of show business that really all the movie stills would be rejected from real publicity campaigns. They show what you can’t show.

I show the tape marks that the actors have to hit to stay in focus—but I don’t show the actors or costumes. I show things that go wrong like hair that gets stuck in the gate and ruins a scene. I just show everything that could go wrong and celebrate the failure of show business and the art world, hopefully in a humorous way, because I love everything I make fun.

Well and you’ve lived it—you’ve probably experienced firsthand pretty much everything that could go wrong on set.
Yes, I have, probably [laughs]. And I’ve experienced a lot that went right, too. And sometimes when something goes wrong, it is right in the arts world once it is isolated and put in a different completely showcase what is wrong is right. Like my commercially shot movies don’t work in the art world when I use them for imagery. The worst shot ones work the best.

So you’re using images from your movies as well other filmmakers’.
Once in a while, yes, but just one second of a movie—one second that proves no movies are bad. Because there’s 24 frames a second, and somehow you can find one frame out of 24 in a 90-minute movie that’s good.

Do you truly believe that no movie is bad?
I’m saying if you have access to every frame in a movie, no movie is all bad. You can find one great frame and celebrate it—out of context, stolen, isolated, hidden, put in the wrong projector, the wrong theater, the wrong book for the wrong audience, then it’s good.

I wanted to talk about this photograph called “Divine in Ecstasy.” What were you thinking when you captured that?
I was looking for a still that I didn’t have. I wanted that still. It’s the most ludicrous part of the film [Multiple Maniacs], where Divine is attacked and raped by a transgender man and an insane woman. It’s probably is the most sacrilegious scene to ever be filmed. I never had a still because we were always worried the police were gonna come and get us. We’d been arrested for making a movie before that, Mondo Trasho, so we’d jump out, do a scene, and run! So I just put an old VHS on the TV, and I just kept shooting like a crazed fan in the dark. And then I saw it and thought, oh God—this looks even artier than I could ever imagine. So that’s how I started doing this. Stills are what everyone remember from movies. I always knew how important they were. Even when I had no budget, I had stills.

Why is this photo considered your first official visual art piece?
I never say the word “art.” When people say to me, “I’m an artist,” I secretly think, “I’ll be the judge of that.” Someone else can call me an artist; I’m not calling myself an artist. I think that is up to others and history to call you an artist. But it was my first photograph that was ever shown in an art gallery.

Well, assuming what you’re exhibiting is art, do you see your work as pop art or conceptual art or what would you classify it as?
I think it is conceptual, if I had to name it. I think it all up before I do it. and then I have to go find the images to write with, to edit with, to make that concept come through. The whole idea behind the show is, can art be funny? It’s always been witty, but can it be funny? To me, it can be. But we’ll see.

---

John Picks His Favorites

Beverly Hills John. 2012. Rubell Family Collection, Miami. © John Waters, Courtesy Marianne Boesky Gallery

“I always say L.A. is just one big York Road. To me, eventually everyone is gonna look the same in L.A. There’s only so many kinds of faces you can get.”

Congratulations. 2014. Collection of Brenda Richardson. © John Waters, Courtesy Marianne Boesky Gallery
“Congratulations is code. When your gallery calls you and says, ‘congratulations,’ you know that you sold something. When you’re a collector and you say, ‘I want it,’ the art dealer will say, ‘congratulations’—which to me is so ludicrous. Many galleries leave the price list out with red dots on [the pieces] when they’re sold. I told the story of the worst thing that can happen in the medium that is the best thing that can happen.”

Divine in Ecstasy. 1992. Collection of Amy and Zachary Lehman. © John Waters, Courtesy Marianne Boesky Gallery
“I wanted that still. It’s the most ludicrous part of the film [Multiple Maniacs], where Divine is attacked and raped by a transgender man and an insane woman. So I just put an old VHS on the TV, and I just kept shooting like a crazed fan in the dark. And then I saw it and thought, oh God——this looks even artier than I could ever imagine. So that’s how I started doing this. It was my first photograph that was ever shown in an art gallery.”

Loser Gift Basket. 2006. Courtesy of the Artist and Marianne Boesky Gallery, New York. © John Waters
“I’m trying to imagine and celebrate everything that can go wrong in show business. Everybody used to give away gift baskets. If you went to the Oscars as a presenter, you’d get cars and stuff. You’d get amazing stuff. But then they started taxing you. It ruined—overnight—the gift bag business. This was my idea of what could be the worst gift basket if you lost the Oscars.”