<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Joker &#8211; Baltimore Magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/tag/joker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.baltimoremagazine.com</link>
	<description>The Best of Baltimore Since 1907</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 02:46:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Movie Review: Birds of Prey</title>
		<link>https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/movie-review-birds-of-prey/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Weiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birds of Prey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harley Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margot Robbie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/?p=71387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wpb-content-wrapper"><div class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid"><div class="wpb_column vc_column_container vc_col-sm-12"><div class="vc_column-inner"><div class="wpb_wrapper">
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element" >
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p>Two days from now, Joaquin Phoenix will likely win an Oscar for his depiction of the <em>Joker</em> in Todd Phillips’ lugubrious take on the super villain’s origin story. So, for your consideration, I give you Margot Robbie in <em>Birds of Prey</em>, a performance that is no less inventive and committed, but way more fun.</p>
<p>Robbie plays the notorious Harley Quinn. Her origin story goes like this: At one point a respected psychiatrist, she falls for her patient, the Joker, then falls (literally) into a vat of radioactive goo, and emerges a punkish anarchist with pigtails, hot pants, and zero you-know-whats to give. Does she have any actual super powers? Nothing notable, although she seemingly has more strength and speed than the average person (at least in one scene, that speed is fueled by the giant pile of cocaine she collides with). But her greatest superpower, I suppose, is her absolute embrace of chaos. The crazier things get, the happier she seems.</p>
<p>In the past, Harley has largely been defined by her love of Joker, so <em>Birds of Prey</em> has a pretty fun concept: What happens when Harley and Joker break up? Well, for one, she’s even more manic than usual. But also, the protection he provided her evaporates. She suddenly has several targets on her back. Each new character is introduced by the “grievance” they have with Harley. Suffice it to say she has a knack for pissing people off. </p>
<p>Robbie is having an absolute blast playing this character, an unholy combination of Alex from <em>A Clockwork Orange</em> and Cindy Brady. One minute she’s wreaking havoc on a nightclub—breaking a sexist creep’s legs, puking into a stranger’s purse—the next minute she’s giggling in front of cartoons and kissing her pet hyena. And, occasionally, as she’s glitter bombing a police station or blowing up a chemical plant, she’ll stop to dispense some long-dormant, dimly accessed bit of psychological wisdom. (“Psychologically speaking, vengeance rarely brings the catharsis we hope for.”) </p>
<p>But she’s not the only ass-kicking female in this movie. Harley will eventually end up with a squad, of sorts. There’s detective Renee Montoya (Rosie Perez), fast on the heels of the evil smoothie, Roman Sionis (Ewan McGregor), but never getting credit for her work (that always goes to her male partner). Then there’s deadpan super assassin Helena Bertinelli (Mary Elizabeth Winstead)—she prefers “the Huntress”—who wields a crossbow like a champ and whose ninja-like ways impress the livewire Harley. There’s the tweenage pickpocket Cassandra (Ella Jay Basco). Finally, there’s Black Canary (Jurnee Smollett-Bell, in a star-making performance), a beauty with a killer set of lungs who more-or-less operates a resistance from within Sionis’ deadly organization. </p>
<p><em>Birds of Prey</em> is directed by a woman—Cathy Yan—and it shows. Before you jump to conclusions, it has nothing to do with the amount of action or violence—both are eye-popping and plentiful. But each of its female anti-heroines has her own agency. Although they are all sexy, their sexuality is never exploited. They are not defined by the men in their lives. And although they are technically criminals (Montoya notwithstanding), they ultimately have a shared humanity that makes them natural, if reluctant, allies. </p>
<p>Kinetic, silly, candy-colored, and hyperviolent, <em>Birds of Prey</em> is a serious treat for fans of comic book films. But it wouldn’t work without the equal parts goofy, hilarious, and unhinged performance of its lead. I’ll be back at the end of the year to remind Oscar voters just how great she is.</p>

		</div>
	</div>
</div></div></div></div>
</div>
<p><a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/movie-review-birds-of-prey/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>International Intrigue: My 2020 Oscar Predictions</title>
		<link>https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/oscar-predictions-2020/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Weiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 12:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1917]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Pitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joaquin Phoenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonardo DiCaprio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscar Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parasite]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/?p=71393</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wpb-content-wrapper"><div class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid"><div class="wpb_column vc_column_container vc_col-sm-12"><div class="vc_column-inner"><div class="wpb_wrapper">
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element" >
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p><em>Moonlight</em> ruined everything. I know that seems like an odd thing to say about a heartbreaking gem of a film that bucked the odds to best frontrunner <em>La La Land</em> and win the Best Picture Oscar—but that’s the thing. It gave us hope. It made us believe that the Oscars had turned over a new leaf and were actually willing to vote for beautiful, challenging, original works of art that didn’t necessarily center straight white people.</p>
<p>But, in fact, since <em>Moonlight</em> won two years ago, the Academy has chosen two rather accessible, middlebrow films, both which celebrated diversity in a somewhat pat and paternalistic way. </p>
<p>Two years ago was <em>The Shape of Water</em>. I liked the film well enough—and lord knows Guillermo del Toro is an Oscar-caliber director—but found its odd mixture of whimsy and menace slightly off-putting. What’s more, its message of embracing the “other” was simplistic to say the least. Still, that was a masterpiece compared to last year’s <em>Green Book</em>, one of the most baffling Oscar wins in recent years.</p>
<p>The point is, neither of those films was the best of its year—or even the best film nominated (last year gave us <em>Roma</em> and <em>A Star is Born</em>; the year before gave us the embarrassment of riches that was <em>Phantom Menace</em>, <em>Call Me By Your Name</em>, and <em>Dunkirk</em>).</p>
<p>Which brings us to this year. As the Oscar race has come into focus, it seems like two films are duking it out for Best Picture: <em>Parasite</em> and <em>1917.</em></p>
<p>Let me make something clear: <em>I917 </em>is a good film. I gave it a <a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/movie-review-1917" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">good review</a>. I recommend it to friends. I liked it! But it’s no <em>Parasite</em>, a singular <a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/movie-review-parasite" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">masterpiece</a> that is one of the most original, smart, and genre-smashing films I’ve ever seen. </p>
<p>In this scenario, <em>1917</em> is the <em>La La Land</em>—the good film that also seems like the safe and predictable choice. <em>Parasite</em> is <em>Moonlight</em> (obviously, an even better comparison would be <em>Roma</em>, another foreign language film that was nominated for Best Picture, but let’s stick with my analogy here).</p>
<p>Were this 2018, the year after <em>Moonlight</em> won, I would’ve confidently chosen <em>Parasite</em>. But the <em>Shape of Water</em> and <em>Green Book</em> have mucked up the works. My head is spinning. I don’t know who to believe!</p>
<p>Anyway, with that confidence-inspiring introduction under my belt, here are my best guesses for this year’s Oscars, including how secure I am with each pick. </p>
<h4>Best Picture </h4>
<p><em>Ford v Ferrari</p>
<p>The Irishman</p>
<p>Jojo Rabbit</p>
<p>Joker</p>
<p>Little Women</p>
<p>Marriage Story <br />1917 <br />Once Upon a Time&#8230;in Hollywood <br />Parasite</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win:</strong> <em>1917</em><br />
 <strong><br />Who should win:</strong> <em>Parasite, Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood</em>, or <em>The Irishman<br />
 </em><strong><br />How confident am I in my prediction?</strong> I had to make prediction, and a prediction was made. </p>
<h4>Best Director<br />
</h4>
<p>Martin Scorsese,<em> The Irishman</em> <br />Todd Phillips, <em>Joker</em> <br />Sam Mendes, <em>1917</em> <br />Quentin Tarantino, <em>Once Upon a Time&#8230;in Hollywood</em> <br />Bong Joon-ho, <em>Parasite</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win:</strong> Sam Mendes<br />
 <strong><br />Who should win:</strong> Bong Joon-ho<br />
 <strong><br />How confident am I in my prediction?</strong> Moderately?</p>
<h4>Best Actor<br />
</h4>
<p>Antonio Banderas, <em>Pain and Glory</em> <br />Leonardo DiCaprio, <em>Once Upon a Time&#8230;in Hollywood</em> <br />Adam Driver, <em>Marriage Story</em> <br />Joaquin Phoenix, <em>Joker</em> <br />Jonathan Pryce, <em>The Two Popes</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win:</strong> Joaquin Phoenix<br />
 <strong><br />Who should win:</strong> Leonardo DiCaprio<br />
 <strong><br />How confident am I in my prediction:</strong> Is there a word greater than “extremely”?</p>
<h4>Best Actress<br />
</h4>
<p>Cynthia Erivo, <em>Harriet</em> <br />Scarlett Johansson, <em>Marriage Story</em> <br />Saoirse Ronan, <em>Little Women</em> <br />Charlize Theron, <em>Bombshell</em> <br />Renée Zellweger, <em>Judy</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win:</strong> Renée Zellweger <strong><br />Who should win:</strong> Saoirse Ronan<br />
 <strong><br />How confident am I in my prediction?</strong> Does a bear relieve itself in the woods?</p>
<h4>Best Supporting Actor<br />
</h4>
<p>Tom Hanks, <em>A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood</em> <br />Anthony Hopkins, <em>The Two Popes</em> <br />Al Pacino, <em>The Irishman</em> <br />Joe Pesci, <em>The Irishman</em> <br />Brad Pitt, <em>Once Upon a Time&#8230;in Hollywood</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win:</strong> Brad Pitt<br />
 <strong><br />Who should win:</strong> Joe Pesci<br />
 <strong><br />How confident am I in my prediction?</strong> Bet the house confident</p>
<h4>Best Supporting Actress </h4>
<p>Kathy Bates, <em>Richard Jewell</em> <br />Laura Dern, <em>Marriage Story</em> <br />Scarlett Johansson<em>,</em><em> Jojo Rabbit</em> <br />Florence Pugh, <em>Little Women</em> Margot Robbie, <em>Bombshell</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win:</strong> Laura Dern<br />
 <strong><br />Who should win:</strong> Scarlett Johannson<br />
 <strong><br />How confident am I in my prediction? </strong>Tattooing it on my arm confident</p>
<h4>Best Adapted Screenplay<br />
</h4>
<p>Steven Zaillian, <em>The Irishman</em></p>
<p>Taika Waititi, <em>Jojo Rabbit</em> <br />Todd Phillips &amp; Scott Silver, <em>Joker</em></p>
<p>Greta Gerwig, <em>Little Women</em></p>
<p>Anthony McCarten, <em>The Two Popes</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win:</strong> <em>Jojo Rabbit</em></p>
<p><strong>Who should win:</strong> <em>The Irishman</em></p>
<p><strong>How confident am I in my prediction?</strong> Not wildly</p>
<h4>Best Original Screenplay<br />
</h4>
<p>Rian Johnson, <em>Knives Out</em></p>
<p>Noah Baumbach, <em>Marriage Story</em></p>
<p>Sam Mendes &amp; Krysty Wilson-Cairns, <em>1917</em></p>
<p>Quentin Tarantino, <em>Once Upon a Time…In Hollywood</em></p>
<p>Bong Joon Ho, Han Jin Won, <em>Parasite</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win:</strong> <em>Parasite<br />
 </em><strong><br />Who should win:</strong> <em>Marriage Story</em></p>
<p><strong>How confident am I in my prediction?</strong> My palms are sweaty.</p>
<h4>Best Documentary Feature<br />
</h4>
<p><em>American Factory</em></p>
<p><em>The Cave</em></p>
<p><em>The Edge of Democracy</em></p>
<p><em>For Sama</em></p>
<p><em>Honeyland</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win:</strong> <em>American Factory</em><br />
 <strong><br />Who should win:</strong> <em>Honeyland</em></p>
<p><strong>How confident am I in my prediction?</strong> I mean, the Obamas produced it.</p>
<h4>International Film<br />
</h4>
<p><em>Corpus Christi</em>, Poland</p>
<p><em>Honeyland</em>, North Macedonia</p>
<p><em>Les Miserables</em>, France</p>
<p><em>Pain and Glory</em>, Spain</p>
<p><em>Parasite</em>, South Korea</p>
<p><strong>Who will win:</strong> <em>Parasite</em></p>
<p><strong>Who should win:</strong> <em>Parasite</em></p>
<p><strong>How confident am I in my prediction?</strong> Brad Pitt confident</p>
<h4>Best Cinematography<br />
</h4>
<p>Rodrigo Prieto, <em>The Irishman</em></p>
<p>Lawrence Sher, <em>Joker</em></p>
<p>Jarin Blaschke, <em>The Lighthouse</em> <em><br /></em><br />
 Roger Deakins, <em>1917</em><br /> Robert Richardson, <em>Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win:</strong> <em>1917</em></p>
<p><strong>Who should win:</strong> <em>Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood</em></p>
<p><strong>How confident am I in my prediction?</strong> Not Brad Pitt confident, but confident all the same. </p>
<h4>Animated Feature<br />
<em><br /></em></h4>
<p><em>Toy Story 4</em></p>
<p><em>Missing Link</em></p>
<p><em>I Lost My Body</em></p>
<p><em>How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World</em></p>
<p><em>Klaus</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win:</strong> <em>Toy Story 4</em></p>
<p><strong>Who should win:</strong> <em>Toy Story 4</em> <br /><strong>How confident am I in my prediction?</strong> I don’t really see—checks notes—<em>Klaus</em> pulling the upset here. <br /><em><br />The Oscars air this Sunday, February 9 on ABC. Check back to see how I did</em></p>

		</div>
	</div>
</div></div></div></div>
</div>
<p><a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/oscar-predictions-2020/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review: Joker</title>
		<link>https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/movie-review-joker/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Weiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2019 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joaquin Phoenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Phillips]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/?p=17624</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wpb-content-wrapper"><div class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid"><div class="wpb_column vc_column_container vc_col-sm-12"><div class="vc_column-inner"><div class="wpb_wrapper">
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element" >
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p>Origin stories are baked into the mix of comic book super heroes—I’ve seen poor little Bruce Wayne watch his parents get shot and Peter Parker get stung by a radioactive spider more times than I can count. Villains can also get origin stories—we’ve seen versions of that in <em>Suicide Squad</em> and <em>X-Men</em>. But <em>Joker</em> is something completely different. </p>
<p>This is an origin story about a notorious DC Comics villain—a ridiculous character who dresses like a clown and giddily revels in violence and mayhem—treated with all the seriousness of a gritty psychological drama. Instead of taking its cues from Tim Burton, or even Christopher Nolan, director Todd Phillips (<em>The Hangover</em>) takes his cues from <em>Taxi Driver</em>, <em>A Clockwork Orange</em>, <em>Fight Club</em>, and, most explicitly, <em>The King of Comedy</em>. I suppose this was inevitable, as comic book movies have gotten more and more self-serious and the Joker character, in particular, has moved from camp (Cesar Romero) to horror (Heath Ledger), but I find the whole enterprise wearying and a little ridiculous. </p>
<p>Does the world really need another movie about a mentally ill loner who snaps? And, in particular, does it need one that comes with all the fanfare of a DC Comics “event” picture, one that will bring young men in to the theater to revel in its loser-turned-powerful-vigilante narrative?</p>
<p>Frankly, I find it difficult to evaluate Joaquin Phoenix’s performance as Joker, who goes by Arthur Fleck for most of the film. There’s a lot going on there. The actor lost a ton of weight for the role and he holds in his stomach to create a grotesque concave effect. (Grotesque is a buzzword for this film.) His hair is long and straggly. His face is lined. And then there’s his mannerisms, a never-ending series of tics and spasms. Arthur has a condition brought on by a brain injury where he sometimes laughs uncontrollably, especially when he’s agitated or nervous. It’s a sick, joyless laugh and Phoenix wields it best when Arthur attempts standup—a lifelong ambition—for the first time. He gets up on stage and begins to chortle and the audience is confused—is this part of the bit?—and then his laughter is mingled with tears of frustration and gasped snippets of dialogue as he tries to spit out a joke. </p>
<p>Later, when Arthur begins to transform into the Joker—taking his violent, cathartic revenge on a society that has trampled all over him—the laugh becomes more intentional and his body language more fluid. While not quite a merry prankster a la <em>A Clockwork Orang</em>e’s Alex, he does begin to find some joy in his own villainy. Phoenix, a brilliant actor, is fully committed to this part—and his commitment is what makes the film palatable. But I still wasn’t sure if it was great acting or just <em>a lot</em> of acting.</p>
<p>Before he becomes the Joker, Arthur lives with his sickly mother (Frances Conroy) in a small, cramped apartment in Gotham City. He works as a clown-for-hire and worships the Johnny Carson-style talk show host Murray Franklin (played, in a meta bit of casting, by <em>King of Comedy</em>’s Robert De Niro). His greatest ambition is to get on the show. Suffice it to say, be careful what you wish for. </p>
<p><em>Joker</em> is made with an undeniable amount of skill. Phillips clearly worships Martin Scorsese (his <em>War Dogs</em> was another film that toed the line between rip-off and homage) and he mimics his idol pretty expertly, right down to the extreme and sometimes sickening violence. But the thing is, we already have <em>Taxi Driver</em> and <em>King of Comedy</em>—and they’re freaking great. The notion of doing a comic book version of those films is nothing more than a gimmick—one that left a sour taste in my mouth. </p>

		</div>
	</div>
</div></div></div></div>
</div>
<p><a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/movie-review-joker/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 49/55 objects using Redis
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.baltimoremagazine.com @ 2026-06-22 02:26:19 by W3 Total Cache
-->