<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>predictions &#8211; Baltimore Magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/tag/predictions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.baltimoremagazine.com</link>
	<description>The Best of Baltimore Since 1907</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2020 09:40:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>The Oscar Nominations Are In&#8230;And They&#8217;re Kind of Boring</title>
		<link>https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/2020-oscar-nominations-are-in-and-theyre-kind-of-boring/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Weiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 12:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snubs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/?p=71503</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wpb-content-wrapper"><div class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid"><div class="wpb_column vc_column_container vc_col-sm-12"><div class="vc_column-inner"><div class="wpb_wrapper">
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element" >
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p>The Oscar nominations were announced this morning, and I have one word to say about them: Meh.</p>
<p>Not that there aren’t lots of great films nominated—2019 was an exceptionally strong year in film—but there were virtually no surprises, and not a single thrilling, wackadoodle, “Whoa, I didn’t see <em>that</em> coming!” choice.</p>
<p>Right out the gate, let me say this: The Oscars have made a push for diversity in recent years, expanding the Academy membership to include more women and people of color. Based on these nominations, they still have a long way to go.</p>
<p>Of the five director nominees, not a single one is female. This in a year where Céline Sciamma directed the ravishing <em>Portrait of a Lady on Fire</em>, Mati Diop directed the haunting <em>Atlantics</em>, and Greta Gerwig managed to make <a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/movie-review-little-women" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><em>Little Women</em></a> feel vital again.</p>
<p>As for the actors, Cynthia Erivo was nominated for her excellent work in <a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/movie-review-harriet" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><em>Harriet</em></a>, but Lupita Nyong’o, who so brilliantly negotiated a dual role in <a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/movie-review-us" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><em>Us</em></a> (one a gentrified mama bear protecting her cubs; the other a feral, vengeance-seeking underground woman) was absent. And I was rather shocked that Awkwafina, who won the Golden Globe for her great work in <a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/movie-review-the-farewell" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><em>The Farewell</em></a>, didn’t even get a nod, nor did the elegant Zhao Shuzhen, who played her beloved Nai-Nai. Likewise, not a single one of the actors from <a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/movie-review-parasite"><em>Parasite</em></a> was nominated. Rather curious, for a film that racked up so many other awards.</p>
<p>So yeah…DO BETTER, Academy.</p>
<p>(On the bright side, <em>Honeyland</em>, the year’s best documentary and one of my favorite films, period, got a bit of a surprise nomination for both Best Documentary and Best International Film, so I’ll take my pleasures where I can get them.)</p>
<p>Okay, let’s break down some of the nominations a bit further…</p>
<h4>Best Picture </h4>
<p><em>Ford v Ferrari<br /></em><em>T</em><em>he Irishman<br /></em><em>Jojo Rabbit<br /></em><em>Joker<br /></em><em>Little Women<br /></em><em>Marriage Story</em><em> <br />1917</em><em></p>
<p>Once Upon a Time&#8230;in Hollywood</em></p>
<p><em>Parasite</em></p>
<p><strong>Surprises:</strong> Not really any.</p>
<p><strong>Snubs:</strong> Just to establish my terms: When I talk about snubs, I&#8217;m not talking about my personal preferences—which include the crazy genius of <em>Uncut Gems</em> and the aforementioned <em>Portrait of a Lady on Fire</em>—but films and performances that were generating a lot of pre-awards buzz and were considered real contenders. On that scale, there really aren’t any, although some thought the criminally entertaining <em>Knives Out</em> had a shot.</p>
<p><strong>The contenders:</strong> At this point, it feels like a battle between <em>Once Upon a Time&#8230;in Hollywood</em> and <em>1917</em>. While I really admired <em>1917</em>, I don’t think it’s half the film OUATIH is. I’d also be beyond thrilled to see either <em>Parasite</em> or <em>The Irishman</em> win, but the odds do not appear to be in their favor.</p>
<h4>Best Director</h4>
<p>Martin Scorsese, <em>The Irishman</em></p>
<p>Todd Phillips, <em>Joker</em></p>
<p>Sam Mendes, <em>1917</em></p>
<p>Quentin Tarantino, <em>Once Upon a Time&#8230;in Hollywood</em></p>
<p>Bong Joon-ho, <em>Parasite</em></p>
<p><strong>Surprises:</strong> Todd Phillips for<em> <a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/movie-review-joker" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Joker</a> </em>wasn’t exactly a shockeroo, but it was a little unexpected. He unseated some (stronger IMO) contenders, including Noah Baumbach (<a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/movie-review-marriage-story" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><em>Marriage Story</em></a>) and Greta Gerwig (<em>Little Women</em>). Since Greta and Noah are a couple, they can huddle together and comfort each other with their Best Picture nods. <br /><strong>Snubs:</strong> Besides the two mentioned above, I would’ve been happy to see the great Spanish director Pedro Almodóvar nominated for <em>Pain and Glory</em> (seriously, on what planet is Todd Phillips a better director than Pedro Almodóvar…grrrrr). I didn’t really think that my girl Celine Sciamma was going to get a nod for <em>Portrait of a Lady on Fire</em>, but I allowed myself to briefly dream.</p>
<p><strong>The contenders:</strong> This is a close one! At this point, I have a hunch that Sam Mendes is going to win for <em>1917</em>, but I wouldn’t rule out Tarantino or Bong Joon-ho.</p>
<h4>Best Actor</h4>
<p>Antonio Banderas, <em>Pain and Glory</em></p>
<p>Leonardo DiCaprio, <em>Once Upon a Time&#8230;in Hollywood</p>
<p></em>Adam Driver, <em>Marriage Story</em></p>
<p>Joaquin Phoenix,<em> Joker</em></p>
<p>Jonathan Pryce, <em>The Two Popes</em></p>
<p><strong>Surprises:</strong> Jonathan Pryce snuck in for his role as Pope Francis in <em>The Two Popes</em>. That certainly wasn’t a shock, but he wasn’t a lock, either.</p>
<p><strong>Snubs:</strong> I was really hoping my man Adam Sandler was going to get nominated for his nervous breakdown of a performance in <em>Uncut Gems</em>. Many people penciled in <em>Rocketman</em>’s Taron Egerton, fresh off his win at the Golden Globes, but that always seemed like a bit of a long shot. Christian Bale was also considered a contender for his strong work in <em>Ford v Ferrari</em>, but Pryce nabbed that final slot.</p>
<p><strong>The contenders:</strong> It’s looking a lot like Joaquin Phoenix’s year. I’m <em>marginally</em> okay with that. I love Phoenix as an actor, but I happened to think his work in <em>Joker</em> was a bunch of nervous tics masquerading as a performance. Of this crop, DiCaprio would be my personal choice, but yeah, I’m not holding my breath.</p>
<h4>Best Actress</h4>
<p>Cynthia Erivo, <em>Harriet</em></p>
<p>Scarlett Johansson, <em>Marriage Story</em></p>
<p>Saoirse Ronan, <em>Little Women</em></p>
<p>Charlize Theron, <em>Bombshell</em></p>
<p>Renée Zellweger, <em>Judy</em></p>
<p><strong>Surprises:</strong> None really, although I suppose Erivo over Nyong’o or Awkwafina is a <em>tiny </em>upset.</p>
<p><strong>Snubs:</strong> I already said my piece about Nyong’o above. To me, she gave the female performance of the year. <br /><strong>The contenders:</strong> The grim, workmanlike march of Renée Zellweger toward her inevitable win has begun.<strong><br /></strong></p>
<h4>Best Supporting Actor</h4>
<p>Tom Hanks, <em>A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood</em></p>
<p>Anthony Hopkins, <em>The Two Popes</p>
<p></em>Al Pacino, <em>The Irishman</em></p>
<p>Joe Pesci, <em>The Irishman</p>
<p></em>Brad Pitt, <em>Once Upon a Time&#8230;in Hollywood</em></p>
<p><em><strong>Surprises:</strong></em> Again, none really. (I told you these awards were meh.)<strong></p>
<p>Snubs:</strong> Many, including myself, hoped that Song Kang-ho from <em>Parasite</em> would be acknowledged. Willem Dafoe in <em>The Lighthouse</em> and Jamie Foxx in <em>Just Mercy</em> were two other names that had been getting some mild buzz.<strong></p>
<p>The contenders:</strong> Pen it in, place your bets, take out a second mortgage on the house, Brad Pitt is winning this award.*</p>
<p><em>*Baltimore </em>magazine does not condone betting and is certainly not responsible for any bets made as a result of this article.<br />
<em>**</em>But seriously, he’s a lock.</p>
<h4>Best Supporting Actress</h4>
<p>Kathy Bates, <em>Richard Jewell</em></p>
<p>Laura Dern, <em>Marriage Story</em></p>
<p>Scarlett Johansson,<em> Jojo Rabbit</em></p>
<p>Florence Pugh, <em>Little Women</em></p>
<p>Margot Robbie, <em>Bombshell</em></p>
<p><strong>Surprises:</strong> Kathy Bates for <em>Richard Jewell</em> was definitely a bit of an upset. But who can ever begrudge the great Bates a ticket to the party?<strong></p>
<p>Snubs:</strong> Two words: J and Lo. For what it’s worth, I voted for Lopez when I filled out my own <a href="http://www.dcfilmcritics.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Washington DC Area Film Critics Association</a> ballot. I was also a bit surprised and disappointed not to see Zhao Shuzhen on this list.<strong></p>
<p>The contenders:</strong> It’s early, but another near lock is Laura Dern for <em>Marriage Story</em>. I don’t see anyone upsetting her.</p>
<p>The Oscars are February 9 on ABC. Check out the complete list of the nominations <a href="https://www.vulture.com/2020/01/oscar-nominations-2020-full-list.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">here</a>. For more Oscar-related content, including my final picks, watch this space. </p>

		</div>
	</div>
</div></div></div></div>
</div>
<p><a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/2020-oscar-nominations-are-in-and-theyre-kind-of-boring/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why This Year’s Oscar Winners Are a Crapshoot</title>
		<link>https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/oscar-predictions-2019/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Weiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Picture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/?p=25416</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wpb-content-wrapper"><div class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid"><div class="wpb_column vc_column_container vc_col-sm-12"><div class="vc_column-inner"><div class="wpb_wrapper">
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element" >
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p>I used to be really good at predicting the Oscars. I had a tidy formula: The picture had to be both accessible and grand in scale or intent; it had to flatter the voters or make them feel virtuous for voting for it. In 2014, a lot of my colleagues were predicting that Richard Linklater’s masterful <em>Boyhood</em> would win Best Picture. After all, it had swept most of the critic’s awards. But I had a strong hunch it wouldn’t. The film was too long, too personal, not quite accessible enough (I’d heard more than one person call it the dreaded B word—boring). I suspected that the far showier <em>Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance)</em>, a film that should’ve been disqualified for the title alone, would win, and I was right.</p>
<p>But all that changed in recent years, as the #OscarsSoWhite hashtag shook the Academy to its core and they were finally compelled to do the right thing and expand their membership to include more young people and people or color. Suddenly, the Oscars were less monolithic (a great thing!) and therefore less predictable.</p>
<p>I predicted that <em>La La Land</em> would win Best Picture in 2017 (and I was right for 30 confusing seconds, too!), but the artsy, meditative, beautiful <em>Moonlight</em> did. An indie coming of age film about a black queer youth? This was unprecedented, wonderful, and, yes, game changing.</p>
<p>All of this is my way of saying, well, I have no idea what’s going to happen this year. A few years ago, I would’ve assumed that my favorite film of the year—<em>Roma</em>—had no shot. Again, too long, too artsy, too personal. It has subtitles! And from friends I’d once again heard the “B” word. I also might’ve considered the fact that a Mexican director—Guillermo del Toro—had won Best Picture the previous year. Would the Oscars really award Mexican directors its highest honor two years in a row? But that’s old-school thinking. My suspicion is that this new class of Oscar voters doesn’t care about trends or legacies. They have good, varied taste and are simply looking for the best picture and performances (how they overlooked Ethan Hawke for <em>First Reformed</em> still remains a mystery). </p>
<p>Okay, let’s take a look at how the race is shaping up with picks for some of the main categories. Again, <em>I know nothing</em>.</p>
<p><strong>BEST PICTURE </strong></p>
<p><em>A Star is Born</em></p>
<p><em>BlackKklansman</em></p>
<p><em>Green Book</em></p>
<p><em>Roma</em></p>
<p><em>Black Panther</em></p>
<p><em>Bohemian Rhapsody</em></p>
<p><em>The Favourite</em></p>
<p><em>Vice</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win</strong>: <em>Roma</em></p>
<p><strong>Who might win</strong>: God help me, <em>Green Book</em></p>
<p><strong>Who should win</strong>: <em>Roma</em></p>
<p><strong>Analysis</strong>: Honestly, this is a pretty mediocre lineup, with one truly great film (<em>Roma</em>), four genuinely good ones (<em>A Star is Born</em>, <em>BlackKklansman</em>, <em>Black Panther</em>, <em>The Favourite</em>), and three duds (<em>Green Book</em>, <em>Vice</em>, <em>Bohemian Rhapsody</em>). There were so many better films this year that should’ve been nominated (<em>Can You Ever Forgive Me?</em>, <em>Eighth Grade</em>, <em>If Beale Street Could Talk</em>, just off the top of my head). If any of my top five wins, I’ll be okay with it. Watch out if one of the bottom three takes the gold. Somebody at the Academy will be receiving a STERNLY WORDED LETTER.</p>
<p><strong>DIRECTING </strong><strong> </strong> </p>
<p>Alfonso Cuarón, <em>Roma</em></p>
<p>Spike Lee, <em>BlackKklansman</em></p>
<p>Adam McKay, <em>Vice</em></p>
<p>Yorgos Lanthimos, <em>The Favourite</em></p>
<p>Pawel Pawlikowski, <em>Cold War</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win</strong>: Alfonso Cuarón</p>
<p><strong>Who might win</strong>: Spike Lee</p>
<p><strong>Who should win</strong>: Alfonso Cuarón</p>
<p><strong>Analysis</strong>: Can you believe that this is Spike Lee’s first nomination for Best Director? That is literally criminal. I’d be happy to see him take home a long overdue gold guy, but much as I admired <em>BlackKklansman</em>, I don’t think it’s his best work. It would be tantamount to Scorsese finally winning for <em>The Departed</em>.  </p>
<p><strong>ACTOR IN A LEAD ROLE </strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Christian Bale, <em>Vice</em></p>
<p>Rami Malek, <em>Bohemian Rhapsody</em></p>
<p>Bradley Cooper, <em>A Star is Born</em></p>
<p>Viggo Mortensen, <em>Green Book</em></p>
<p>Willem Dafoe, <em>At Eternity’s Gate</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win</strong>: Christian Bale</p>
<p><strong>Who might win</strong>: Rami Malek</p>
<p><strong>Who should win</strong>: Bradley Cooper</p>
<p><strong>Analysis</strong>: This is my no guts, no glory pick. Most prognosticators are picking Malek to win for his entertaining portrayal of Freddie Mercury. But it would be rare for a television actor, in his first major film role, to take home such a big award. Then again, that’s old school Oscar prognosticator thinking. Aaaah! I just can’t help myself!</p>
<p>(P.S. Both Ethan Hawke, in <em>First Reformed,</em> and Joaquin Phoenix, in <em>You Were Never Really Here</em>, gave better performances than either of the two frontrunners. #SorryNotSorry)</p>
<p><strong>ACTRESS IN A LEAD ROLE </strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Glenn Close, <em>The Wife</em></p>
<p>Lady Gaga, <em>A Star is Born</em></p>
<p>Olivia Colman, <em>The Favourite</em></p>
<p>Melissa McCarthy, <em>Can You Ever Forgive Me?</em></p>
<p>Yalitza Aparacio, <em>Roma</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win</strong>: Glenn Close</p>
<p><strong>Who might win</strong>: Olivia Colman</p>
<p><strong>Who should wi</strong>n: Melissa McCarthy</p>
<p><strong>Analysis</strong>: What a stellar lineup! Five great performances and any one of these women deserve to win. I’m partial to Melissa McCarthy and Olivia Colman. That being said, her royal Glenn-ness is long overdue and <em>The Wife</em> really allows her to shine.  </p>
<p><strong>ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE </strong> </p>
<p>Mahershala Ali, <em>Green Book</em></p>
<p>Adam Driver, <em>BlackKklansman</em></p>
<p>Richard E. Grant, <em>Can You Ever Forgive Me?</em></p>
<p>Sam Elliott, <em>A Star is Born</em></p>
<p>Sam Rockwell, <em>Vice</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win</strong>: Mahershala Ali</p>
<p><strong>Who might win</strong>: Richard E. Grant</p>
<p><strong>Who should win</strong>: Richard E. Grant</p>
<p><strong>Analysis</strong>: Ali is a great actor, but I wasn’t a fan of this film—the script was too facile. But Ali has cleaned up all the pre-Oscar awards so this one is a bit of a no-brainer. That being said, Grant—who gives a career best performance in <em>Can You Ever Forgive Me?</em>—is killing the Oscar campaign season, charming interviewers and fanboying over Barbra Streisand. Could he sneak in for the upset? Fingers crossed!  </p>
<p><strong>ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE </strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Regina King, <em>If Beale Street Could Talk</em></p>
<p>Amy Adams, <em>Vice</em></p>
<p>Emma Stone, <em>The Favourite</em></p>
<p>Marina de Tavira, <em>Roma</em></p>
<p>Rachel Weisz, <em>The Favourite</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win</strong>: Regina King</p>
<p><strong>Who might win</strong>: Rachel Weisz</p>
<p><strong>Who should win</strong>: Rachel Weisz</p>
<p><strong>Analysis</strong>: The pleasant surprise here is de Tavira, who was so wonderful in <em>Roma</em> and didn’t get a lot of pre-Oscar award-season love. But Rachel Weisz is <em>everything</em> in <em>The Favourite</em>, one of the most smart, perfectly calibrated, and memorable performances of the year (although arguably she and Stone are actually co-leads along with Colman). I’d also love to see Amy Adams to get off the schneid, as they say in sports, and finally win her first Oscar but not for <em>Vice</em>. Never for <em>Vice</em>. That being said, King’s work in <em>If Beale Street Could Talk</em> is the essence of a supporting part. She absolutely shines in a few key scenes. Who could argue with this brilliant actress snatching the gold?</p>
<p><strong>ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY </strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p><em>The Favourite</em></p>
<p><em>First Reformed</em></p>
<p><em>Green Book</em></p>
<p><em>Roma</em></p>
<p><em>Vice</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win</strong>: <em>The Favourite</em></p>
<p><strong>Who might win</strong>: Ugh, <em>Green Book</em></p>
<p>Who should win: <em>Can You Forgive Me?</em> (But since it’s not nominated, <em>First Reformed</em>.)</p>
<p>Analysis: I’d really love to see Paul Schrader win for his searching, deeply felt <em>First Reformed</em> script, but I’m not holding my breath. But I really dug <em>The Favourite</em>, so I can hardly complain here. </p>
<p><strong>ADAPTED SCREENPLAY </strong> </p>
<p><em>The Ballad of Buster Scruggs</em></p>
<p><em>BlackKklansman</em></p>
<p><em>Can You Ever Forgive Me?</em></p>
<p><em>If Beale Street Could Talk</em></p>
<p><em>A Star Is Born</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win</strong>: <em>BlackKlansman</em></p>
<p><strong>Who might win</strong>: <em>If Beale Street Could Talk</em></p>
<p><strong>Who should win</strong>: <em>Can You Ever Forgive Me?</em></p>
<p><strong>Analysis</strong>: My guess? Spike won’t win Best Director and this will be his (not too shabby) consolation prize. An aside: Isn’t it wild that <em>A Star is Born</em>—once heralded as Best Picture frontrunner—might walk away with nothing more than a “Best Song” win?</p>
<p><strong>BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM</strong></p>
<p><em>Cold War</em></p>
<p><em>Roma</em></p>
<p><em>Shoplifters</em></p>
<p><em>Capernaum</em></p>
<p><em>Never Look Away</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win</strong>: <em>Roma</em></p>
<p><strong>Who might win</strong>: <em>Cold War</em></p>
<p><strong>Who should win</strong>: <em>Roma</em></p>
<p><strong>Analysis</strong>: I confess I’ve only seen three of these contenders (<em>Roma, Cold War</em>, and <em>Shoplifters</em>). All are varying degrees of good and great (I was disappointed that Lee Chang-dong’s <em>Burning</em> didn’t make the cut), but <em>Roma </em>is the film of the year. My only concern: Will voters who picked it in the Best Foreign Language Film category feel they’ve been-there-done-that when it comes times to vote for Best Picture? </p>
<p><strong>BEST DOCUMENTARY FEATURE</strong></p>
<p><em>Free Solo</em></p>
<p><em>Hale County This Morning; This Evening</em></p>
<p><em>Minding the Gap</em></p>
<p><em>Of Fathers and Sons</em></p>
<p><em>RBG</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win</strong>: <em>Free Solo</em></p>
<p><strong>Who could win</strong>: <em>RBG</em></p>
<p><strong>Who should win</strong>: <em>Minding the Gap</em></p>
<p><strong>Analysis</strong>: How on earth is <em>Won’t You Be My Neighbor</em> not on this list? That’s it. That’s the analysis.</p>
<p><strong>BEST ANIMATED FEATURE</strong></p>
<p><em>Incredibles 2</em></p>
<p><em>Isle of Dogs</em></p>
<p><em>Mirai</em></p>
<p><em>Ralph Breaks the Internet</em></p>
<p><em>Spider Man: Into the Spiderverse</em></p>
<p><strong>Who will win</strong>: <em>Spider Man: Into the Spiderverse</em></p>
<p><strong>Who might win</strong>: <em>Incredibles 2</em></p>
<p><strong>Who should win</strong>: <em>Spider Man: Into the Spiderverse</em></p>
<p><strong>Analysis</strong>: Talk about a come-from-behind win (probably). Barely a month ago, <em>Spiderverse</em> wasn’t even in the conversation. Then it came out, blew everyone’s collective minds, and is now poised for the win against some formidable competition. </p>

		</div>
	</div>
</div></div></div></div>
</div>
<p><a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/oscar-predictions-2019/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Predictions 2018</title>
		<link>https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/oscar-predictions-2018/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Weiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/?p=27769</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wpb-content-wrapper"><div class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid"><div class="wpb_column vc_column_container vc_col-sm-12"><div class="vc_column-inner"><div class="wpb_wrapper">
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element" >
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p><em>Moonlight</em> changed everything. Predicting the best picture at the Oscars used to be a fairly straightforward task. You looked for several things: A film that is epic in scale. One that is literary or historic—bonus for lots of human suffering. A film that is socially aware, but never in a truly provocative way. The film should be smart, but accessibly so—surrealism and ambiguity are big no-nos. It should have impressive, even splashy production values. Bonus points if it stars beloved actors or established directors. And if it celebrates Hollywood and the joys of movie making, all the better. Also, and not to put too fine a point on it, it should generally be heteronormative and the cast should be mostly white.   </p>
<p>From there, you take the film that ticks the most of those boxes and—ta da! You’ve built yourself an Oscar winner!</p>
<p>But <em>Moonlight</em> didn’t really tick any of those boxes—not only did it feature a black, gay hero, it was relatively low-budget, and directed by a man who was certainly a rising star, but hardly a household name. What’s more, it was moody, evocative, subtle. Subtle things never win Oscars! It was my <a href="http://www.baltimoremagazine.com/2016/12/19/the-best-of-2016-film" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">favorite film of 2016</a> (along with <em>Manchester By the Sea</em>), but I never thought it was going to win best picture. I had <em>La La Land</em>, all the way. (And so did Faye Dunaway, apparently.)</p>
<p>So why did <em>Moonlight</em> win? Did the Academy suddenly develop more sophisticated taste? Perhaps. Most likely it was attributable to the influx of new Academy members—a much younger, more diverse, and presumably more open-minded group. This new group throws everything out of whack, gloriously I might add. So I’m going to have to recalibrate my Oscar radar. And maybe the notion of an “Oscar film”—that specific type of sturdy, middlebrow film that the Academy always goes for—is gone forever. Suddenly, predicting Oscars feels like a free-for-all. Whee!   </p>
<p>With that being said, here are my best guesses for a few of the major categories. But seriously, you’re on your own here, people. I’m winging it!    <br />
   </p>
<h4>Best Picture<br />
  </h4>
<p><em>Call Me By Your Name</p>
<p>Darkest Hour</p>
<p>Dunkirk</p>
<p>Get Out</p>
<p>Lady Bird</p>
<p>Phantom Thread</p>
<p>The Post</p>
<p>The Shape of Water</p>
<p>Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri<br />
   </em></p>
<p><strong>Who should win:</strong> <em>Call Me By Your Name </em>or <em>Phantom Thread</em></p>
<p><strong>Who could win:</strong> <em>Get Out;</em> <em>Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri</em></p>
<p><strong>WHO WILL WIN:</strong> <em>THE SHAPE OF WATER</em><br /> </p>
<h4>Best Actress in a Leading Role</h4>
<p>Sally Hawkins, <em>The Shape of Water</em> <br /> Frances McDormand, <em>Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri</em><br /> Margot Robbie, <em>I, Tonya</em><br /> Saoirse Ronan, <em>Lady Bird</em><br /> Meryl Streep, <em>The Post</em></p>
<p><strong>Who should win:</strong> Frances McDormand</p>
<p><strong>Who could win:</strong> Honestly I don’t see any real threats to McDormand here</p>
<p><strong>WHO WILL WIN</strong>: FRANCES MCDORMAND<br /> </p>
<h4>Best Actor in a Leading Role<br />
  </h4>
<p>Daniel Day-Lewis, <em>The Phantom Thread<br />
  </em><br />Timotheé Chalamet, <em>Call Me By Your Name<br />
  </em><br />Daniel Kaluuya, <em>Get Out<br />
  </em><br />Gary Oldman, <em>Darkest Hour<br />
  </em><br />Denzel Washington, <em>Roman J. Israel, Esq.<br />
   <br />
  </em></p>
<p><strong>Who should win:</strong> Timotheé Chalamet   </p>
<p><strong>Who could win:</strong> Timotheé Chalamet; Daniel Day-Lewis</p>
<p><strong>WHO WILL WIN</strong>: GARY OLDMAN</p>
<h4>Best Actress in a Supporting Role</h4>
<p>Mary J. Blige, <em>Mudbound<br />
</em>  <br />Allison Janney, <em>I, Tonya<br />
  </em><br />Lesley Manville, <em>Phantom Thread<br />
  </em><br />Laurie Metcalf, <em>Lady Bird<br />
  </em><br />Octavia Spencer, <em>The Shape of Water<br />
  </em> </p>
<p><strong>Who should win:</strong> Laurie Metcalf or Lesley Manville</p>
<p><strong>Who could win:</strong> Laurie Metcalf; Lesley Manville</p>
<p><strong>WHO WILL WIN</strong>: ALLISON JANNEY</p>
<h4>Best Actor in a Supporting Role</h4>
<p>Willem Dafoe, <em>The Florida Project<br />
  </em><br />Woody Harrelson, <em>Three Billboards outside Ebbing Missouri</em></p>
<p>Richard Jenkins, <em>The Shape of Water<br />
  </em><br />Christopher Plummer, A<em>ll the Money in the World<br />
  </em><br />Sam Rockwell, <em>Three Billboards outside Ebbing, Missouri<br />
   </em></p>
<p><strong>Who should win:</strong> Willem Dafoe</p>
<p><strong>Who could win:</strong> Willem Dafoe</p>
<p><strong>WHO WILL WIN</strong>: SAM ROCKWELL</p>
<h4>Best <strong>Animated Feature</strong><br />
  </h4>
<p><em>Coco</p>
<p>Ferdinand</p>
<p>Loving Vincent</p>
<p>The Breadwinner</p>
<p>The Boss Baby<br />
  </em> </p>
<p><strong>Who should win:</strong> <em>The Boss Baby</em> (Just kidding—<em>Coco</em>)</p>
<p><strong>Who could win:</strong> I don’t see any real challengers here</p>
<p><strong>WHO WILL WIN</strong>: COCO </p>
<h4>Best <strong>Cinematography</strong><br />
  </h4>
<p>Roger A. Deakins, <em>Blade Runner 2049</em></p>
<p>Bruno Delbonnel, <em>Darkest Hour<br />
  </em><br />Dan Laustsen, <em>The Shape of Water<br />
  </em><br />Rachel Morrison, <em>Mudbound<br />
  </em><br />Hoyte Van Hoytema, <em>Dunkirk<br />
   <br />
  </em></p>
<p><strong>Who should win:</strong> Rachel Morrison</p>
<p><strong>Who could win:</strong> Dan Laustsen; Hoyte Van Hoytema</p>
<p><strong>WHO WILL WIN</strong>: ROGER A. DEAKINS</p>
<h4>Best <strong>Director</strong></h4>
<p>Paul Thomas Anderson, <em>Phantom Thread</em></p>
<p>Guillermo del Toro, <em>The Shape of Water</em></p>
<p>Greta Gerwig, <em>Lady Bird<br />
</em>  <br />Christopher Nolan, <em>Dunkirk<br />
  </em><br />Jordan Peele, <em>Get Out<br />
   <br />
</em>  </p>
<p><strong>Who should win:</strong> Paul Thomas Anderson</p>
<p><strong>Who could win:</strong> Christopher Nolan</p>
<p><strong>WHO WILL WIN</strong>: GUILLERMO DEL TORO</p>
<h4>Best <strong>Documentary Feature</strong><strong><br /></strong><br />
  </h4>
<p><em>Faces Places</p>
<p>Last Men in Aleppo</p>
<p>Strong Island</p>
<p>Abacus: Small Enough To Jail</p>
<p>Icarus<br />
   <br />
  </em></p>
<p><strong>Who should win:</strong> <em>Faces Places<br />
  </em></p>
<p><strong>Who could win:</strong><em> Icarus; Last Men in Aleppo</em></p>
<p><strong>WHO WILL WIN</strong>: <em>FACES PLACES</em> </p>
<h4>Best<strong> Foreign Language Film</strong><br />
  </h4>
<p><em>A Fantastic Woman</p>
<p>Loveless</p>
<p>On Body and Soul</p>
<p>The Insult</p>
<p>The Square<br />
  </em> </p>
<p><strong>Who should win:</strong> <em>Loveless</em></p>
<p><strong>Who could win:</strong> <em>The Square<br />
  </em></p>
<p><strong>WHO WILL WIN</strong>: <em>A FANTASTIC WOMAN</em> </p>
<h4>Best<strong> Adapted Screenplay</strong><br />
  </h4>
<p>Aaron Sorkin, <em>Molly’s Game<br />
  </em><br />James Ivory, <em>Call Me By Your Name</em></p>
<p>Scott Frank and James Mangold and Michael Green, <em>Logan<br />
  </em><br />Scott Neustadter, Michael H. Weber, <em>The Disaster Artist</em></p>
<p>Dee Rees, Virgin Williams, <em>Mudbound</em><br />
   </p>
<p><strong>Who should win:</strong> James Ivory</p>
<p><strong>Who could win:</strong> Hmmm . . . not seeing any real challengers here</p>
<p><strong>WHO WILL WIN</strong>: JAMES IVORY </p>
<h4>Best<strong> Original Screenplay</strong><br />
  </h4>
<p>Guillermo Del Toro &amp; Vanessa Taylor, <em>The Shape of Water<br />
  </em><br />Greta Gerwig, <em>Lady Bird<br />
  </em><br />Emily V. Gordon Kumail Nanjiani, <em>The Big Sick<br />
  </em><br />Jordan Peele, <em>Get Out</em></p>
<p>Martin McDonagh, <em>Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri</em><br />
   </p>
<p><strong>Who should win:</strong> Jordan Peele</p>
<p><strong>Who could win:</strong> This category is pretty wide open, I could almost see anyone taking it. But Martin McDonagh poses the biggest threat.   </p>
<p><strong>WHO WILL WIN</strong>: JORDAN PEELE</p>
<p><em>The Oscars air Sunday, March 4 at 8 p.m. on ABC</em></p>

		</div>
	</div>
</div></div></div></div>
</div>
<p><a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/oscar-predictions-2018/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>If You Build It, They Will Vote: My 2014 Oscar Predictions</title>
		<link>https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/if-you-build-it-they-will-vote-my-2014-oscar-predictions/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Weiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/?p=66405</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have a (semi) foolproof strategy for guessing which film is going to win Best Picture at the Oscars. The film basically has to be very entertaining/accessible while also making the voters feel good about themselves. It’s really that simple. The film has to give off the whiff of importance—if not actually be important—but never &#8230; <a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/if-you-build-it-they-will-vote-my-2014-oscar-predictions/">Continued</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a (semi) foolproof strategy for guessing which film is<br />
 going to win Best Picture at the Oscars. The film basically has to be<br />
very entertaining/accessible while also making the voters feel good<br />
about themselves. It’s really that simple. The film has to give off the<br />
whiff of importance—if not actually <em>be</em> important—but never at<br />
the expense of the entertainment value. (Films that are historical,<br />
literary, or confront social justice are particularly well received).<br />
Auteurship is fine, too—voters like to think of themselves as<br />
highbrow—as long as the film isn’t <em>too </em>artsy. If the film has expensive production values, all the better. The Academy likes some bang for its buck.</p>
<p>There are exceptions, of course. Oscar can’t resist a big, splashy musical (see: <em>Chicago</em>). And sometimes they dole out make-good Oscars for directors who should’ve won for earlier, better work (see: <em>The Departed</em>). But for the most part, it’s a solid formula.</p>
<p>Let’s put it in action, shall we? Here are the past 10 winners.</p>
<p><em>Argo</em>,<br />
 2012: Wildly entertaining and the Iran Contra affair is history, right?<br />
 (The more historically edifying, but significantly less entertaining <em>Lincoln,</em> never had a chance.)</p>
<p><em>The Artist</em>, 2011: Manages to be both irresistibly fun and silent! And French! The voters felt smarter just voting for it.</p>
<p><em>The King’s Speech</em>, 2010: British accents, kings and queens, and wildly entertaining. This film was catnip for the voters.</p>
<p><em>The Hurt Locker</em>,<br />
 2009: An important and serious war film that was also a kick-ass action<br />
 film. (And bonus self-congratulatory points: directed by a woman.)</p>
<p><em>Slumdog Millionaire</em>, 2008: Not literary, per se, but Dickensian in its theme and scope, plus set in India, which, like <em>The Artist</em>, made the voters feel worldly. Also, criminally entertaining.</p>
<p><em>No Country For Old Men</em>,<br />
 2007: Based on a novel by Cormac McCarthy. (Literature!) Directed by<br />
the Coen Brothers (artsy!). Mournful and dark while also being a really<br />
awesome serial killer flick.</p>
<p><em>The Departed</em>, 2006: This was<br />
 one of the aforementioned make-good wins. But it did have a lot of<br />
great fake Boston accents (hell, even Matt Damon and Mark Wahlberg’s<br />
accents sounded fake—and they’re <em>from</em> Boston) and expensive production values to go along with Marty’s way overdue Best Picture.</p>
<p><em>Crash</em>,<br />
 2005: This one—a pseudo-serious, comfortingly liberal multi-arc film<br />
that appealed to the Academy voter’s white man’s guilt (sorry)—still<br />
gets stuck in my craw. <em>Brokeback Mountain</em> was <em>so </em>much better Alas, it never stood a chance.</p>
<p><em>Million Dollar Baby</em>,<br />
 2004: The gritty poverty, high-pedigree director (Clint Eastwood),<br />
gender twist, and tragic ending, gave this (wildly entertaining)<br />
traditional boxing pic a more Oscar-y feel.</p>
<p><em>The Lord of the Rings, Return of the King</em>,<br />
 2003: This one doesn’t quit fit any of the categories, but it’s close<br />
enough. Tolkien is semi-literary (well, it’s a book, at least). The film<br />
 wears its expensive production values on its sleeve. And it’s a little<br />
bit of a make-good Oscar for the first two installments of the saga,<br />
which were both worthy in their own right.</p>
<p>Okay, now let’s move onto this year.</p>
<p>Of the nine films nominated, only three are really considered contenders:</p>
<p><em>Gravity<br />American Hustle</em><br />and<em><br />12 Years a Slave</em></p>
<p>Based on the above theory, you might think I’d be going with <em>American Hustle</em>,<br />
 which is both historical (ish) and easily the most entertaining of the<br />
three. But . . . a few caveats. I don’t think it’s historical <em>enough</em><br />
 (who’s ever even heard of Abscam?), it bears too much of a resemblance<br />
to last year’s Best Picture winner (wide lapels, big mustaches, bad<br />
perms), and it has been the victim of a bit of a<a href="http://variety.com/2013/film/awards/how-american-hustle-conned-the-critics-1200963635/"> last minute smear </a>campaign<br />
 by the Oscar-watching press, many of whom consider it too lightweight<br />
for consideration. (For the record, I thought it was just dandy.)</p>
<p>That leaves <em>Gravity</em> and <em>12 Years a Slave</em>.</p>
<p><em>Gravity</em><br />
 has the production values, for sure, but that’s about it. Sci-fi is a<br />
hard sell for the Oscars. What’s more, I’ve heard a lot of whispers from<br />
 my readers—mostly women, interestingly, since <em>Gravity</em> features<br />
 such a strong female lead—who say they found it uninvolving (mostly<br />
they were unimpressed by the film’s soaring visuals and complained about<br />
 the dialogue, which <em>is</em> a little cheesy).</p>
<p><em>12 Years a Slave</em><br />
 is legitimately edifying (not just pseudo-edifying) and, in the hands<br />
of the brilliant director Steve McQueen, it’s extremely involving. No,<br />
not easy to watch, but riveting.</p>
<p>For that reason, I feel that <strong>12 Years a Slave</strong> comes close to being a perfect Oscar film: Edifying, engrossing, artsy (it feels auteurish), important.</p>
<p>It’s my pick as this year’s Best Picture.</p>
<p>My thoughts on a few of the other big races.</p>
<p>Best Actress: <strong>Cate Blanchett, <em>Blue Jasmine</em></strong><br />There<br />
 were some whispers that the Woody Allen controversy was going to affect<br />
 Blanchett’s win, but I don’t see that happening. The works speaks for<br />
itself and it’s just too good.</p>
<p>Best Actor: <strong>Matthew McConaughey, <em>Dallas Buyer’s Club</em></strong><br />They say Leonardo DiCaprio is gaining on him—and I would love that, because he’s great in <em>The Wolf of Wall Street</em> and so overdue. There’s also a chance that <em>12 Years a Slave</em><br />
 will become a juggernaut, in which case the equally deserving Chiwetel<br />
Ejiofor could swoop in. But I think the McConnassiance, as it’s been<br />
dubbed by the press, is too irresistible, both in terms of the concept<br />
(lightweight leading man becomes serious character actor) and delivery<br />
(McConaughey is great in <em>The Dallas Buyer’s Club</em>—and <em>The Wolf of Wall Street</em> for that matter). (The fact that he’s currently impressing Oscar voters with his work on the HBO hit <em>True Detective</em> only further galvanizes his frontrunner status.)</p>
<p>Best Supporting Actor: <strong>Jared Leto, <em>Dallas Buyer’s Club</em></strong><br />The<br />
 closest thing to a lock in the major races. And anyone was concerned<br />
that his nose-thumbing, “grrr, I’m a rock star!” attitude might be<br />
disruptive to the ceremonies, he’s been very well behaved and gracious<br />
in all the Oscar dress rehearsals (Golden Globes, Screen Actor’s Guild,<br />
et al), even bringing  his mother. I don’t see anyone beating him.</p>
<p>Best Supporting Actor: <strong>Lupita Nyong’o, <em>12 Years a Slave</em></strong><br />This<br />
 one is close, between Nyong’o and new Oscar darling Jennifer Lawrence.<br />
Quality of the work should never, ever be a factor when predicting Oscar<br />
 winners (sigh), but great as Lawrence is, it’s hard to look at her work<br />
 side-by-side with Nyong’o’s and not pick the <em>12 Years a Slave</em><br />
star. Also, Oscar loves anointing a new female superstar, particularly<br />
in this category. (Look no further than last year’s win for Lawrence.)<br />
Also helpful? Nyong’o has been dazzling the voting public with her <a href="http://www.fabsugar.com/Lupita-Nyongo-Red-Carpet-Style-32226589">impeccable awards-style</a> and preternatural beauty. I say this is her year.</p>
<p>Best Director: <strong>Alfonso Cuarón, </strong><em><strong>Gravity</strong>The director/film split is a very rare thing in Oscar’s history, although the most recent was last year, when <em>Argo</em><br />
 won for best picture and Ang Lee won for best director. Oddly enough, I<br />
 see it happening again, only because Oscar knows the visionary Alfonso<br />
Cuaron a bit better than they know the (younger) visionary Steve<br />
McQueen. Both film’s are “director’s films” but <em>Gravity</em> seems<br />
to have sprung, whole cloth, from Cuarón’s rich magination. I say<br />
history repeats itself and we have another Best Picture/Best Director<br />
split.</em></p>
<p><em>Other picks:</em></p>
<p><em>Adapted Screenplay: <strong><em>12 Years a Slave</em></strong><br />Original Screenplay: <strong><em>Her</em></strong><br />Cinematography: <strong><em>Gravity</em></strong><br />Documentary: <strong><em>20 Feet From Stardom</em></strong><br />Foreign Language Film: <strong><em>The Great Beauty</em></strong><br />Animated Film: <strong><em>Frozen</em></strong></em></p>
<p><em>I’ll be back with my wrap-up after this Sunday&#8217;s telecast.</em></p>

<p><a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/if-you-build-it-they-will-vote-my-2014-oscar-predictions/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 47/94 objects using Redis
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.baltimoremagazine.com @ 2026-06-18 09:21:12 by W3 Total Cache
-->