<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scarlett Johansson &#8211; Baltimore Magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/tag/scarlett-johansson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.baltimoremagazine.com</link>
	<description>The Best of Baltimore Since 1907</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 17:38:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Movie Review: The Phoenician Scheme</title>
		<link>https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/movie-review-the-phoenician-scheme/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Weiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 17:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benedict Cumberbatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benicio del Toro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Cranston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Cera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scarlett Johansson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Hanks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wes Anderson]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/?p=171316</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As I’ve said before, Wes Anderson is like cilantro. You either love him or you think he tastes like soap (metaphorically speaking, at least). Me? I love him. (I also love cilantro, but will need to do further research to determine a corollary.) In fact, over the years, I’ve turned into something of a Wes &#8230; <a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/movie-review-the-phoenician-scheme/">Continued</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I’ve said before, Wes Anderson is like cilantro. You either love him or you think he tastes like soap (metaphorically speaking, at least).</p>
<p>Me? I love him. (I also love cilantro, but will need to do further research to determine a corollary.)</p>
<p>In fact, over the years, I’ve turned into something of a Wes Anderson apologist. I’ve at least <em>liked</em> all of his films and loved most of them. My favorites, because who can resist ranking him, are <em>The Grand Budapest Hotel</em> and <em>The Royal Tenenbaums</em>. My least faves are <em>Isle of Dogs</em> and <em>The Darjeeling Limited</em>—but honestly, there’s not a dud in the bunch. The complaint I’ve heard most often is that his films are cold, airless—all style, no heart. But I find his stories of misfits fumbling their way toward each other to be enormously touching. (If anything, I think his films can be accused of sentimentality.)</p>
<p>When I defend Anderson’s films, I talk about their uncanny beauty, their comic drollness, their affection for weirdos and outcasts and intellectuals; their stubborn cleaving to all things analog in a digital world. Yes, they are overly orderly—symmetrically placed little dioramas, composed as though they are meant to be viewed from above. Yes, his characters speak in a signature stilted deadpan, often while looking directly at the camera. Yes, his films will undoubtedly contain hand-written index cards or a general cataloging of things and a persistent nostalgia for the fascinations of the 20<sup>th</sup> century, especially those discovered by a curious and precocious boy from Houston.</p>
<p>But, as <a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/movie-review-asteroid-city/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Asteroid City</em></a>, a meta film within a film about an alien landing in the desert, proved, he still has new tricks up his sleeve. His fastidious style is paradoxically flexible—it has the capacity to contains multitudes.</p>
<p>That said, when I saw the trailer for <em>The Phoenician Scheme</em>, featuring every Anderson tic in the book along with most of his regular troupe of actors, I grew concerned. This seemed more like a Wes Anderson parody than a Wes Anderson film. Had the auteur finally succumbed to the inevitable?.</p>
<p>I had sort hoped that, after his <em>Asteroid City</em> broke down the process of storytelling, Wes might go back to basics, play it straight, prove that he didn’t need his distinct style to tell a good story. In fact, he doubled down.</p>
<p>In the opening scene, we meet international businessman/scoundrel Zsa-zsa Korda (Benicio del Toro), who’s a passenger in a small, single engine airplane. There’s a thud and then an explosion. A bomb has gone off, taking out the back half of the plane and top half of his assistant, who was sitting in a jump seat. It’s a joke (I think)—the assistant has been sliced perfectly in half. Anderson even has to do gore in an orderly way.</p>
<p>The opening credits show Zsa-zsa, who has survived the assassination attempt, just as he has survived several others, lounging in the clawfoot bathtub of his regal bathroom. We <em>literally</em> see the image from overhead: the tub perfectly placed to the left of the frame, a small record player behind him, the toilet, with a black seat, and bidet which is being used as an ice bucket for a bottle of champagne (observed closely enough, every Anderson frame contains a little treat); two sinks, perpendicular to each other; and a stunning mid-century modern tile floor.</p>
<p>Just as the perfectly sliced-in-two assistant seems like a bit of self-parody, this overhead shot feels defiant. You think I’m not gonna do me? Dream on.</p>
<p><em>The Phoenician Scheme</em> is a visual banquet, extremely funny, fast paced, and powered by an Igor Stravinsky score. (This music nerd was <em>pumped</em>.)</p>
<p>But I confess it left me wanting. That thing I always defend Wes over—the emotional connection I feel to the characters and the story—was missing.</p>
<p>I can usually see the direct line from Wes’ imagination to the film itself. <em>The Life Aquatic</em> obviously came from a boyhood fascination with Jacques Cousteau. <em>The Royal Tenenbaums</em> has Salinger’s <em>Franny and Zoey</em> as its muse. <em>The Grand Budapest Hotel</em> is about the cleaving to old world manners and beauty, something Anderson knows a thing or two about. <em>Moonrise Kingdom</em> is about precocious children and first love.</p>
<p>But what is Anderson’s connection to the story of <em>The Phoenician Scheme</em>—wherein the amoral oligarch Zsa-zsa tries to connect with his only daughter, Liesl (Mia Threapleton, Kate Winslet’s kid), a nun-in-training, and determine if she’s worthy of his fortune. He also has nine small sons that mostly pop up as a kind of visual joke—hanging from banisters and crouched in balconies. (One is always shooting things with a bow and arrow.) But Zsa-zsa has no love or interest in these little boys. He only hopes to earn the affection and trust of his stoic daughter, whose mother died under suspicious circumstances (“They say you murdered her, Liesl says. “They who?” replies Zsa-zsa.) You see, despite his ornate home and trappings of wealth, Zsa-zsa is broke, or runs the risk of becoming broke if he can’t convince his associates to pay the “gap”—essentially the money he needs to become profitable on whatever his latest land-grabbing scheme happens to be. (Not only was I fuzzy on the details, I truly don’t think Wes cares about them.)</p>
<p>Accompanying Liesl and Zsa-zsa on their quest for unscrupulous business partners is the fussy and kind-hearted Bjorn (Michael Cera), who is an entomologist and tutor (not for the children, for Zsa-zsa himself). He instantly falls for Liesl. “Could you imagine falling love with a man like me?” he says, in his Andy Kaufman-as-Latka Norwegian accent.</p>
<p>So we move from set piece to set piece, as Zsa-zsa tries to secure funds. We meet a dashing prince (Riz Ahmed), a pair of midwestern brothers who are supernaturally great at basketball (Tom Hanks and Bryan Cranston), a stern beauty whom Zsa-zsa proposes to just because he can (Scarlett Johansson), a cheerful American ship captain (Jeffrey Wright), and many more. Benedict Cumberbatch also turns up as Zsa-zsa’s brother, who may even be more of a jerk than he is.</p>
<p>There are planes crashes and an ongoing joke about giving out hand grenades as a gift, as though they are cigars There’s quicksand, because kids who grew up in the ’70s like Wes love quicksand. There are beautifully crafted shoe boxes filled with index cards because this is a Wes Anderson film, after all.</p>
<p>But I just couldn’t find my way into it. Is Zsa-zsa supposed to be a stand-in for Trump? Is this Anderson’s oblique way of addressing contemporary politics. (Or, with is 10 children, perhaps he’s supposed to be Musk&#8230;or both?). The thing is, we like Zsa-zsa, because he has his own version of a moral code and because he loves his daughter (if only his daughter) and mostly because he is played by del Toro, who is rakishly charming here. And frankly, I don’t want to see a Trump redemption story, if that’s even what this is.</p>
<p>Yes, there is something touching about Zsa-zsa’s relationship with Liesl and, of course, we root for the earnestly romantic Bjorn as well. And it’s funny watching Liesl get slowly but surely corrupted by her father. She begins to drink. Then she starts smoking a pipe. Then she accepts a gift of a bedazzled pipe. (Threapleton, who shares her mother’s round and open face, is wonderful here. She tries to resist the allure of her father’s exotic, chaotic life, but just can’t help herself.) But <em>The Phoenician Scheme</em> didn’t capture my imagination, nor did it enchant me the way other Anderson films have.</p>
<p>I was thoroughly entertained and left a bit cold. Is this what it’s like to not love Wes Anderson?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p><a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/movie-review-the-phoenician-scheme/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maryland Movie Corner: &#8216;He&#8217;s Just Not That Into You&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/maryland-movie-corner-hes-just-not-that-into-you/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Weiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 14:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Affleck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Cooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comforting movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Aniston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scarlett Johansson]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/?p=71216</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wpb-content-wrapper"><div class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid"><div class="wpb_column vc_column_container vc_col-sm-12"><div class="vc_column-inner"><div class="wpb_wrapper">
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element" >
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p>Everyone comforts themselves during a crisis in a different way. Some people obsessively clean and organize the house. Some people cook elaborate pies and stews. Some people immerse themselves in the news because the only thing worse than knowing about all the scary coronavirus stuff? NOT knowing.</p>
<p>Me? I’m a movie girl, myself—and I’m particularly drawn to that sweet spot of films that are cheery, not too deep (but not flat-out stupid either), and are populated by beautiful people looking for love.</p>
<p>In other words, what I’m looking for is <em>He’s Just Not That Into You,</em> which the benevolent (and perhaps prescient) Netflix gods chose to release on March 1 and which—bonus!—takes place entirely in Baltimore. </p>
<p>In a way, I’m surprised that <em>He’s Just Not That Into You</em>, originally released in 2009, is not a bigger cult classic, along the lines of <em>Love Actually</em>, a film that it glancingly resembles. It’s a charming ensemble film, certainly not without its flaws (some of its sexual and gender politics feel <em>very</em> dated), but undeniably fun to watch. Plus, it features a veritable who’s who of famous actors, some who had already achieved peak fame (Jennifer Aniston, Drew Barrymore, Ben Affleck) and some who were still on the rise, like Bradley Cooper and Scarlett Johansson.</p>
<p>I wonder if the silly title—the film, if you don’t know, is based loosely on the popular self-help book of the same name—was a deterrent for people. The book basically lays out the cold, hard truth for women: When a guy likes you, he lets you know. He calls. He asks you out. He has sex with you. No need to do a CSI investigation of his every text message or phone call (or lack thereof). No need to make excuses for him (he’s busy…he’s shy…his feelings are actually <em>too </em>strong). He’ll make his intentions clear. And if he doesn’t? Say it with me: He’s just not that into you. (Dear readers, I regret to inform you that in this, the Year of Our Lord 2020, women are still falling into this same trap.)</p>
<p>The anthology-style movie version looks at a series of typical love and dating miscommunications. Our main heroine is Gigi (Ginnifer Goodwin), who is a case study in optimism and thinking the best of guys who are clearly blowing her off. One night, she heads to the bar to seek out Conor (Kevin Connolly), the real estate agent she had one great date with (alas, no follow up call), and instead falls into a conversation with Conor’s roommate, bar manager Alex (Justin Long). </p>
<p>Alex immediately recognizes Gigi for the kind of girl she is: a hopeless romantic who refuses to read the signs. As something of a jaded lothario himself, he’s seen it all too many times. He takes it upon himself to advise Gigi in the ways of the male psyche. (While delightful, Gigi is not the brightest bulb on the tree—she’s positively gobsmacked when it’s pointed out to her that men don’t always mean what they say). Alex’s job is to basically lay out the premise of the book—which would make him something of an insufferable mansplainer if Long weren’t so appealing. </p>
<p>It’s also rather ingenious of the film to make Alex a cynic who takes a thoroughly clinical approach to dating and love. Can you begin to guess what might happen between him and Gigi?</p>
<p>The other storylines are as follows: Aniston plays Beth, who’s in love with Neil (Affleck), who doesn’t believe in marriage. They have a happy domestic partnership. Does she really need that bling? Then there’s Ben (Cooper), who is contentedly married to his longtime sweetheart Janine (Jennifer Connelly), until he meets human temptation in the form of yoga instructor/singer Anna (Johansson). He resists—until he doesn’t. </p>
<p>Anna, meanwhile is being pursued by Conor—yes, that Conor—who doesn’t take the signs that she’s indifferent to his charms. (“You see? It works both ways!” the film seems to argue, although clearly this is more of a XX chromosome phenomenon.) Finally, there’s the woefully underused Drew Barrymore, as a woman who sells classified ads at the (made up) <em>Baltimore Blade</em> and who gets lots of “you go, girlfriend!” dating advice from her gay male cohorts (I told you the film’s sexual politics were whack.)</p>
<p>All in all, it was fun to watch all of these comely people have extreme social contact while I was practicing social distancing and contemplating not taking a shower for the third day in a row. And the best part of all? I didn’t think about the coronavirus ONCE when I was watching it.</p>
<p>But now for the important part: How does it rate on the Baltimore Movie Scale?</p>
<p><strong>How Baltimore Is It?</strong>: Extremely Baltimore. They mention Baltimore several times. And it actually was filmed in Baltimore, mostly around the Canton and Brewers Hill neighborhoods, it would seem. This is not one of these cases where Baltimore is standing in for some other city (we’re looking at you, <em>House of Cards</em>)—we are loudly and proudly playing ourselves.</p>
<p><strong>What They Got Right</strong>: Beth can see the Domino Sugar sign from her apartment. Ben is seen drinking Clipper City beer. Drew Barrymore shops in a CVS. At one point, we see the Brewers Hill/Mr. Boh sign. During Beth’s sister’s wedding, her father (Kris Kristofferson!) advises crab-eating guests that the “yellow stuff is not hot mustard. It’s the crab’s hepatopancreas.” Way to drop the knowledge, Beth’s dad.</p>
<p><strong>What They Got Wrong</strong>: Beth, Janine, and Gigi work for a spice company (good!) named…New Colony Spice? Couldn’t they at least have gone with McConnor’s or something? Beth’s brothers-in-law watch Terps sports on TV (good!)—but they also watch hockey(?) and football, not basketball or lacrosse. The biggest problem, of course, is that, according to this film, Baltimore is largely packed with attractive, affluent, white people. Not one of the leads is black or Latino. It’s amazing films could get away with that crap as recently as 2009. Yeesh. </p>

		</div>
	</div>
</div></div></div></div>
</div>
<p><a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/maryland-movie-corner-hes-just-not-that-into-you/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review: Marriage Story</title>
		<link>https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/movie-review-marriage-story/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Weiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scarlett Johansson]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/?p=23612</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wpb-content-wrapper"><div class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid"><div class="wpb_column vc_column_container vc_col-sm-12"><div class="vc_column-inner"><div class="wpb_wrapper">
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element" >
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p>Divorce is sad. It’s especially sad when there are kids involved, but it’s sad no matter what: two people who once loved each other, who committed to each other, who built a life together, realizing they just can’t do it anymore. And it’s fairly easy to convey this sadness in a film: Show the two protagonists as a happy couple—maybe include their meet-cute, his teary-eyed first glance at her walking down the aisle, the joyful birth of their child—and then show the aftermath of that broken bond. But Noah Baumbach does something with a higher degree of difficulty in <em>Marriage Story</em>. When we first meet Nicole (Scarlett Johansson) and Charlie (Adam Driver), they are describing what they love about each other (“She is a mother who plays”; “He cries easily in movies”), but it’s an exercise in a mediator’s office. They’ve already split up. The marriage is over. </p>
<p>It didn’t end in a dramatic fashion. Yes, there was an affair (his) but by that point, the relationship was already broken. They simply realized they couldn’t make it work any longer. </p>
<p>At a young age, Nicole, who grew up in Hollywood with an actress mother, made a teen movie that hit it big (a la <em>Fast Times at Ridgemont High</em>? Baumbach was once married to the actress Jennifer Jason Leigh). She could’ve stayed in L.A., been a screen actress, but instead she went to an avant-garde theater production where she fell in love with the hulking actor on stage. It turns out he was also the director. His name was Charlie. </p>
<p>She moved to New York and her life became subsumed by his. Not in the traditional, staying-home-to-raise-the-child way—they were both good, involved parents to their young son Henry (Azhy Robertson)—but she joined his theater troupe, became his actress muse. And one day she looked up and realized she was a New Yorker, in an apartment decorated in his taste, living a life that he had dreamed of, but she hadn’t. So they separated.</p>
<p>Nicole goes to LA to film a pilot and hires a feminist lawyer Nora Fanshaw (Laura Dern) who more than lightly encourages her to lean in and get what’s hers. She presents the most unsavory version of Charlie to Nicole. Meanwhile, Charlie first visits his own shark of a lawyer (Ray Liotta) but thinks he’s too aggressive (not to mention too expensive) so instead he settles for the mild-mannered, slightly doddering Bert Spitz (Alan Alda). He thinks the divorce will be simple. Two people who once really loved each other, amicably splitting up their lives. On a visit to LA, he goes to the house of Nicole’s mother (Julie Hagerty), where Nicole and Charlie have been staying, and you can tell he’s comfortable there. He reaches into the fridge and grabs a roast chicken. He greets Nicole’s mother by swinging her around. Little does he know that he’s about to be served divorce papers by Nicole’s nervous sister (MerrittWeaver). Turns out, Nicole is planning on staying in Hollywood and keeping Henry with her. </p>
<p>The divorce gets bitter. Charlie dumps Bert Spitz and goes back to the shark. Both Charlie and Nicole seem confused, overwhelmed by what’s happening, swept up in something beyond their control. Can they remember the love they once shared—maybe still share—to get through this together?</p>
<p>Although sadness permeates the film, <em>Marriage Story</em> can be quite funny. There’s a particularly amusing set piece involving a hellish visit from an inscrutable woman hired by the court to observe Charlie’s parenting. Everything that can go wrong does. But of course, even this funny episode is imbued with sadness. He’s screwing things up. He could lose his son.</p>
<p>Both actors are beyond tremendous here. There’s a scene in Nora Fanshaw’s office where Nicole just talks about her life, her marriage, her regrets. It feels like a wonderful monologue in a play. The camera mostly stays trained on Johannson’s face—with its elfin beauty, its lit-from-within glow—and she’s mesmerizing. Driver is her equal. Tears, as we’ve been reminded, come to Charlie easily. But Driver makes him even more pathetic when he’s not crying, just looking crumpled and defeated and baffled. </p>
<p><em>Marriage Story</em> has been compared to <em>Kramer Vs. Kramer</em> (a film I love and will defend ’til the end of time) and it certainly pays explicit homage to that classic. (There’s a funny fakeout where Charlie holds out his arms and Henry goes running right past him; the reverse of a similar scene in <em>Kramer</em>.) But of course, as always, Baumbach is most influenced by Woody Allen (sorry). He makes Woody Allen-esque films about self-aware, artsy, voluble upper-middle-class New Yorkers. His films aren’t as funny as Woody’s, but they’re deeper. Woody Allen films are famously all 98 minutes long. <em>Marriage Story</em>’s running time is 2 hours and 17 minutes. But it earns that time. We get to know Nicole and Charlie, get to care about them, get to mourn what they’ve lost. Divorce is ugly. This film about a particular divorce, however, is quite beautiful. </p>
<p>Marriage Story <em>opens on Thanksgiving at the Parkway Theatre. </p>
<p> </em></p>

		</div>
	</div>
</div></div></div></div>
</div>
<p><a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/movie-review-marriage-story/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Her</title>
		<link>https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/review-her/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Weiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Her]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joaquin Phoenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scarlett Johansson]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/?p=66431</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the not so distant future, a lonely man named Theodore Twombley (Joaquin Phoenix) falls in love with Samantha (the voice of Scarlett Johansson), an intuitive operating system. Meanwhile, his friendship with a recently divorced Amy (Amy Adams) flourishes. You think you know where this story is going—except that you don’t. Because writer/director Spike Jonze &#8230; <a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/review-her/">Continued</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the not so distant future, a lonely man named Theodore Twombley<br />
(Joaquin Phoenix) falls in love with Samantha (the voice of Scarlett<br />
Johansson), an intuitive operating system. Meanwhile, his friendship<br />
with a recently divorced Amy (Amy Adams) flourishes. You <em>think </em>you<br />
 know where this story is going—except that you don’t. Because<br />
writer/director Spike Jonze is simply too interesting, too weird (in the<br />
 best possible sense) to tell us to embrace humanity over technology.<br />
Instead, he suggests something more radical: That happiness, even<br />
artificial happiness, is not something to be trifled with.</p>
<p>While<br />
Theodore’s ex wife (Rooney Mara) pities Theodore for not being able to<br />
sustain a human relationship, his friends, including coworker Paul<br />
(Chris Pratt) are much more blasé about it. Paul even invites the<br />
disembodied Samantha—who rests on a blanket or sits perched in<br />
Theodore’s pocket—on a double-date picnic. Meanwhile, Amy has also<br />
become close to her OS, although their relationship is strictly<br />
platonic.</p>
<p>The best science fiction gives us a credible vision of the future while slyly commenting on our now. <em>Her</em>—with<br />
 its gorgeous, minimalist art direction (by Austin Gorg), retro-future<br />
clothing (Theodore favors orange shirts and high-waisted tweed<br />
trousers), and city streets populated by people who are so plugged into<br />
their interactive devices they barely notice each other—does just that.<br />
(After all, aren’t most of us <em>already</em> in a relationship with<br />
our smartphones?) Jones doesn’t judge, he simply observes, with humor<br />
and humanity. It’s the future, through the eyes of a poet.</p>
<p>Theodore’s<br />
 job is to write letters, mostly love letters of both the platonic and<br />
romantic kind, for people who are unable to properly express themselves.<br />
 A few times Samantha, who absorbs every word of Theodore’s hard drive<br />
in a microsecond, quotes Theodore back to Theodore, and he doesn’t even<br />
realize it. She’s his perfect woman, the Eve to his Adam—except instead<br />
of his rib she’s created out of his hard drive. (And with that breathy<br />
Scarlett Johansson voice, “phone sex” takes on a whole new meaning.)</p>
<p>Creepy?<br />
 Sure. But Theodore is undeniably happy with her. Also, Samantha doesn’t<br />
 isolate him: He sees the world through her eager, insatiably curious<br />
eyes—she actually lifts him from his funk, opens him up to life’s<br />
possibilities.</p>
<p>A lot of science fiction deals with the threat of some sort of man vs. machine rebellion. <em>Her</em> deals with a more pressing threat: Can an Operating System break your heart?</p>

<p><a href="https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/artsentertainment/review-her/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 50/76 objects using Redis
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.baltimoremagazine.com @ 2026-08-03 02:42:45 by W3 Total Cache
-->