The Chatter

Gerrymandering Decision Leaves Maryland Political Leaders Disappointed

After the Supreme Court ruling, calls for reform have increased on both sides of the aisle.

By Evan Greenberg | July 1, 2019, 4:55 pm

-Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call via AP Images
The Chatter

Gerrymandering Decision Leaves Maryland Political Leaders Disappointed

After the Supreme Court ruling, calls for reform have increased on both sides of the aisle.

By Evan Greenberg | July 1, 2019, 4:55 pm

-Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call via AP Images

The word “disappointing” seems to be the prevailing sentiment among many local leaders after the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Maryland Democrats in a gerrymandering case. The ruling maintains the status quo and gives legislatures continued free reign to draw district maps how they see fit.

Chief Justice John Roberts was the swing vote in the 5-4 decision, concluding that “partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.” Essentially, Roberts asserts in his opinion that gerrymandering is not a constitutional question, but rather a political one, the merits of which should be decided in individual legislatures. It’s a win for Maryland Democrats, who already hold a 7-1 majority in the state’s eight-member U.S. House delegation.

In a statement, Maryland Attorney General Brian E. Frosh called the ruling “a sad day for our democracy,” adding that “the attention now turns to Congress.” Congressman Elijah Cummings offered his reaction as well, reinforcing the need for reform when it comes to the practice of gerrymandering.

“Americans deserve to know that, when they cast their ballot, their vote truly matters in choosing who represents them,” Cummings said in a statement. “The ballot is our voice, and we must not let it be muted by partisan gerrymandering. [The] Supreme Court decision reinforces the urgent need for comprehensive redistricting reform to ensure that every American’s vote matters.”

Gerrymandering is not a new issue or practice, but, as technology and the means by which mapping is carried out has become highly specialized, a small tweak can now mean a huge advantage for either side. It’s called into question what should and can be done about the issue—many saw the Supreme Court case as a potential avenue to kickstart reform.

“Gerrymandering is wrong, and both parties are guilty,” reads part of Governor Larry Hogan’s statement on the ruling. “It stifles real political debate, contributes to our bitter partisan polarization, and deprives citizens of meaningful choices. The voters should pick their representatives, not the other way around.”

Chief among the concerns surrounding this hyper-focused gerrymandering is the question of whether or not it infringes upon a person’s freedom of speech or association, says Todd Eberly, an associate professor of political science and public policy at St. Mary’s College of Maryland. Eberly also notes that, especially in Maryland, district Democratic candidates are more incentivized to win their primary over the general election, where the maps are already drawn in a way that favors them to win. The voters represented in these two elections are vastly different, too, and it can result in more extreme candidates ending up as representatives of their districts.

This is particularly important with the impending 2020 election, 2020 census, and subsequent redrawing of maps that will shape elections for the following decade. The 2020 election—of which the Supreme Court has said, at least for now, can proceed onward with maps that have been heavily gerrymandered—will determine the party in power that will be responsible for drawing districts. In Maryland, that could likely mean an overwhelmingly Democratic General Assembly free to continue the same practices the Supreme Court just ruled in favor of.

“[A given party] wants their candidate to win—that’s why they draw their districts the way they do,” Eberly says. “At the same time, they don’t care what the other part wants. Gerrymandering has a whole host of negative effects on governance.”

Meet The Author

Evan Greenberg is the digital editorial assistant for Baltimore magazine. A native of Atlanta, he works on digital initiatives and explores the how and why of what makes the people, places, and things of Baltimore tick.

You May Also Like

The Chatter

Charles Village Construction Plagues Local Businesses

Area shops and restaurants suffered big losses this summer due to ongoing streetwork.

The Chatter

Greedy Reads Plans Remington Expansion for Late Fall

The Fells Point bookstore will open its second location in a space across from R. House.

Charmed Life

Hanifa is the Baltimore Fashion Brand You Need to Know About Right Now

From showing at New York Fashion Week to styling Lizzo and Kylie Jenner, Hanifa is on the rise.

The Chatter

Male/Female Statue: Should It Stay or Go in Penn Station Overhaul?

The future of the long-controversial 52-foot sculpture could be in question with train station redesign.

The Chatter

Pelosi Announces House Will Begin Trump Impeachment Inquiry

Maryland’s Democratic congressional delegation announces support for formal hearings.

Arts & Culture

Final Words

As the Newseum prepares to close, here are the top things to do and see inside its hallowed halls.

Connect With Us

Most Read

New City Council Bill Could Ban Plastic Bag Use Across Baltimore: A vote next week could set in motion a bill that reaches the mayor’s desk.

Cardinal Art Walks Explore Works Outside of the Gallery's Bolton Hill Walls: The ongoing fall exhibition is meant to make participants see the city in a new way.

History of Baltimore's Bygone Synagogues Captured in New Plein Air Art Exhibit: Collection of oil paintings on view at Baltimore Hebrew Congregation through October 28.

The Book Thing Starts Next Chapter Under New Management: Here’s what to know when planning a visit to Baltimore’s free-to-all bookshop.

A New Production of 'The Phantom of the Opera' Is Headed to the Hippodrome: Go behind the mask with the tour's Phantom, Derrick Davis.